Law compromises rules that are created and enforced by societal or governmental instituitions to regulate behaviour. Characterised by its formal and mandatory nature
Law - EG Theft Act 1968
Formally enforce: Laws are enforced through formal institutions such as courts and police
Mandatory: Compliance with the law is not optional. Obliged to follow legal mandates
Morality
Concerns beliefs about what is right and wrong, goof and bad. Beliefs are often derived from societal norms, cultural practices or individual values
Morality
Informally enforceable: Enforced through social norms and pressures then legal mechanisms
Beliefs and morals: Individual or collective norms considered ethical or moral behaviour. Shaped by cultural religion or philosophical influences
Relationship between law and morality (R v Brown) and (Re A)
2 Relationship between laws, morality and society
Durkheim - In complex socities like ours it is impossible to find a single set of moral values acceptable to all. Basic values might be shared but details may differ
Changes in societal values and technological advancements
Moral issues changing overtime Civil Partnership 2004 and Consumer Rights Act 2015
Pluralistic = A pluralistic society celebrates and protects diversity, allowing for multiple cultural traditions, beliefs and lifestyles to coexist respectfully
Challenges of pluralism, law and morality
Balancing conflicting rights and beliefs among diverse groups
3) Academic theories and debates
Natural law theory
Laws must align with a universal moral order to be legitimate
Thomas Aquinas
Thomas Hobbes
Positivism theory
Laws are valid if created through properprocedures, regardless of moral content
JeremyBentham
HLAHart
Natural law: Aquinas - Non secular relgious
Four types of law
Eternal law - The overarching order of the universe established by God
Natural law: Aquinas - Non secular religious
Four types of laws:
Divine law - Revealed through scripture, guiding humans to their ultimate end
Natural law: Aquinas - non secular religious
Four types of laws:
Natural law - Participation in the eternal law by rational creatures, discoverable through reason
Natural law: Aquinas - non secular religious
Four types of laws:
Human law - Man made laws that should derive from naturallaws
Aquinas
Morally known what is right and wrong
Believed valid law must align with the natural law, reflecting God's divine wisdom and order
Aquinas
Purpose of law: Guide humans behaviour towards the common good and away from evil
Aquinas
Moral basis: Laws are inherently moral; they are not just above governing behaviour but about guarding it towards virtue
Aquinas
Role of reason: Human beings can discern natural laws through the use of reason, understanding fundamental moral principles that govern human actions
Natural law: Hobbes - Secular (Non - Religious)
What we want and what we don't want
Natural law: Hobbes - Secular (Non - Religious)
State of Nature
Hobbes depicted a pre - societal'state of nature' characterized by chaos and the 'waragainstall'
Individuals naturalrights to do anything to preserve their own liberty and safety
Natural law: Hobbes - Secular (Non - Religious)
Social contract (survival)
Escape the state of nature, individuals collectively agree to form a society governed by a sovereign
Transferring their individualrights to the sovereign in exchange for protection and order
Natural law: Hobbes - secular (non - religious)
Social contract (survival)
Agreement forms the basis of civil laws and the authority of the sovereign
Natural law: Hobbes secular (non - religious)
Role of reason
First rule - Try to make peace. Since living in constantfear is awful, seeking to live peacefully is logical
Second rule - We then give up some freedoms, creating rules everyone can live by for safety and cooperation
Positivism: Bentham
Separation of law and morality
Insisted on a clear distinction between law (what is) and morality (What ought to be), challenging the idea that laws inherently reflect moral values
Cares about impact of law
Utilitarian (unity) principle
Central to Bentham's philosophy is the principle of utility, which suggests that the rightness of wrongness of an action is determined by its contribution to the maximisation of overall happiness or pleasure
Utilitarian (unity) principle
Laws - Judged by effectiveness - not by consistent notions of morality
Positivism: HLA Hart
Critique of legal positivism predecessors
Hart critiqued earlier positivist theories, including Bentham, for oversimplifing the nature of law the nature of law as it is (de facto in fact) and law it should be (de jure be right)
Primary and secondary rules
Hart introduced the concept of primary and secondary rules
Primary rules dictate behaviour
Secondary rules provide the structure for creating, changing, and interpreting primary rules
Primary and secondary rules
Hart introduced the concept of primary and secondary rules
Most critical secondary rule is the 'rule of recognition' a standard used by society to identify valid legal rules
A legal system exists when a society accepts both primary rules of obligation and the secondary rules that validate them
Hart - Fuller Debate
Hart (Legal positivist)
Hart emphasised that law is defined by social rules by recognised by authorities, independent of moral content
legality of law depends on its adherence to established procedures, and not its moral value
Clear separation between law and morality
Hart - Fuller Debate
Hart (Legal positivist)
Morally repugnant laws, like Nazis can be legally valid if they follow the system's recognised procedures
moral failure does not strip them of legal validity
Hart - Fuller Debate
Fuller (Natural law perspective)
Argued against Hart's strict separation, saying that moral law must align with moral principles to be valid
Introduced 'inner morality of law' - suggesting that laws must be clear, consistent and congruent (in agreement with something) with their actions to effectively guide behaviour and serve the common good
Hart - Fuller Debate
Fuller (Natural law perspective)
Nazi's law moral bankruptcy and failure to guide behaviour according to the inner morality of law rendered them invalid
Hart - Devlin Debate
Devlin (Morality's defender)
Argued that society's moral cohesion is as vital as its physical safety
the law has a role in enforcing moral standards to preserve social order
Believed community's collective morality should guide the limits of individual freedom