classical conditioning is a form of associative learning where 2 things are linked together
unconditioned stimulus (UCS)
naturally triggers an unconditioned response or reflex - don't need to learn to respond as it occurs automatically
unconditioned response (UCR)
a reflex or a natural response to an unconditional stimulus
neutral stimulus(NS)
doesn't trigger any response but when used with an UCS it stimulates learning
conditioned stimulus (CS)
when NS is repeatedly paired with an UCS, it becomes a conditioned stimulus triggering a conditioned response
conditioned response (CR)
response is elicited by the CS and a new association has been learned - the UCR is now the CR
what is pairing
during the conditioning stage, the neutral stimulus and the unconditional stimulus are experienced together - known as pairing
extinction
when CS and UCS have not been paired for a while, the CS no longer triggers the CR as strongly e.g: if the metronome in pavlov has been sounded too many times, dog may not respond to it anymore
spontaneous recovery
extinct responses can form without new pairings with UCS
stimulus generalisation
CR to one object is exhibited on the presence of a similar stimuli
strength of classical conditioning as an explanation for behaviour/learning
research evidence by pavlov that explains CC as an explanation for behaviour
pavlov (1927) conducted research on animals by having a dog associate a metronome to food
overall it is a good controlled study demonstrating CC in animals
weakness of classical conditioning
CC can only explain a small range of behaviours that can be acquired
for example, it can explain why someone learns to fear a dog but does not explain how someone learns and maintains behaviours that they used to avoid dogs such as: avoiding dog parks, running away from them
CC can only be a partial explanation of learning behaviours