How Amateur psychologists interpret behaviours (2.1)
Observing behaviours we often form conclusions based on intuition or experience which lead to mistakes
Intuition
Subjective feeling about what makes sense (overconfidence bias)
Experience
Physical experience you have in your life (doesn't show all possible events and has no comparison group)
Scientific method (2.2)
Process of asking confidence in an idea on systematic observations through research studies to test ideas
Theory data cycle
Process of scientific method that a scientist collect data that can confirm/disconfirm a theory
Theory
Set of prepositions explaining how and why people think act or feel
Hypothesis
Specific prediction stating what will happen in a study if the theory is correct
Data
Empirical observations that scientists gather
Replication
Study conducted more than once on a new sample of participants and obtain the same basic results
Journal
Periodical publishing containing peer reviewed articles on scpecific academic discipline , written for scholarly audiences
Variable
Something of interest that varies from person to person/situation to situation
Measure variable
Value is recorded
Maniuplated variable
Researcher controls usually by assigning different participants to different levels of that variable
Operational definition
Specific way of measure or manipulating an abstract variable in a study
Why operationalize
1. Practical reasons
2. dependent of difficulty to collect data
3. Easier sometimes, better than self report
Descriptive research
Studies research, measure one variable at a time
Self-report in descriptive research
1 - 5 scale in survey research that summarizes people (ex: ladder of life)
Sample
Proud that participates and research belong to a larger population of interest that the research wants to understand
Population of interest
Full set of cases the researcher is interested in
Random sampling
Choosing a sample of participants for a study that are selected at random
Descriptive research based on naturalistic observations and case studies
Descriptive research —> observational research —> naturalistic observation
Naturalistic observation
Observational research method to observe behaviours in normal everyday world (ex: observing toddlers playing — w/o them knowing)
Observational research
Measure variables by observing and recording what people are doing
Case study
Study of an individual with unique conditions in great detail (ex: HM: studied by cognitive psychologist of lobotomy due to epilepsy)
Correlational research
Studies two or more variables in the same people and observes the relationship between the variables
Pattern of associations between variables in Scatterplots
Positive: high scores on one variable with high scores on the other
Negative: low scores with low scores
Zero: no systematic relationship
Review criterion for correlation and causation
1. Are the two variables correlated
2. Temporal evidence: did the causal variable come first before the effect
3. Are ethereal plausible alternative
Correlation and causation
Positive or negative correlation can only predict one variable form another
Third variable problem
Relationship between variables there's an existing variable that can explain causation
Experimental research
Variable manipulated the other is measured. (Provides evidence of causation b/w variables)
Independent variable vs dependent variable
Manipulated in an experiment (x axis) vs measured variable (y axis)
Random assignment
Which participants receive which level of instrument variable
Experimental group
Condition in which some proposed cause of present
Control group
Proposed cause is not present
Placebo effect
People expect to review a treatment but are excise to an inert version
Limitations to descriptive research
Describe what people do but not who is likely to exhibit those behaviors
Limits to correlational research
Yield value insights in research — for variables that cannot be experimentally manipulated (gender, cultural origin)
Limitations to experimental research
Can isolate causal effects — limited to manipulating one or two variables in a single study (more variables can be studied simultaneously in correlational research)
3 key questions to ask in research study for validity
1. How weak did researchers operation the variables
2. Are the prior they situated representatives of the population of interest
3. Can we rule out the most plausible alternative explanations
Validity
Appropriateness of accuracy of the conclusion or decision