Criticise other theories for failing to offer any practical solutions to the problem of rising crime
Regard labelling and critical criminology as too sympathetic to criminals
Right realism - biological differences
Wilson and Herrnstein - crime is caused by a combination of biological and social factors
Personality traits such as aggressiveness, risk taking and low impulse control increase chances of offending
Herrnstein and Murray - main cause of crime is low intelligence, which they also see as biologically determined
Right realism - socialisation and the underclass (Murray)
The best agency of socialisation is the nuclear family
Crime rate is increasing because of a growing underclass who fail to socialise their children properly
Underclass is growing due to welfare dependency
This has led to decline of marriages and growth of lone parents, means socialisation is impacted
Counter - no evidence that young people raised by one parent commit more crimes
Right realism - rational choice theory (Clarke)
decision to commit crime is a choice based on a rational calculation of the likely consequences
If the perceived rewards of crime outweigh the perceived costs, then people will likely offend
Right realism - criticisms of explanations for crime
Ignores wider structural causes such as poverty
Only explains utilitarian crime, not impulsive or violent crime
Rational choice conflicts with biological differences
Lilly - IQ differences account for less than 3% of differences in offending
Right realism - tackling crime (Wilson and Kelling)
Zero tolerance - the police should focus on controlling the streets so that law-abiding citizens feel safe
Claim this method achieved huge reductions of crime after it was introduced in New York in 1994
Counter - Young found that crime was falling in New York 9 years before the policy was introduced
Right realism - further criticisms of zero tolerance
Ignores corporate crime
Gives police free rein to discriminate against minorities
leads to displacement of crime to other areas
Left realism - overview
Like Marxists, they see society as unequal due to capitalism
Unlike Marxists, they believe in gradual change rather than violent overthrow of capitalism
Left realism - relative deprivation (Lea and Young)
People now days are better off, but the media has made us more aware of relative deprivation, raising desire for goods and therefore increasing utilitarian crime
Left realism - subculture (Young)
Inspired by Cohen
There are neighbourhoods in the USA that are fully immersed in the American Dream
Opportunities to achieve these goals legitimately are blocked, resorting in an increase of street crime
Left realism - marginalisation (Young)
These groups lack both clear goals and organisations to represent their interests
Young unemployed people express their frustration through criminal means such as violence and rioting
Left realism - late modernity (Young)
Instability, insecurity and exclusion have worsened crime
Calls 1950s - 60s the 'golden age'
Increased media has pushed consumerist cultural messages
Greater emphasis on leisure and immediate gratification
The poor still deprived of opportunities
Diversity means right and wrong has become blurred
Left realism - falling crime rate
Crime rate has fallen since 1990s, which disproves LR theory that crime is a major threat
Counter - Young says that because crime is a social construct, it may still be seen as a problem
2019 England and Wales Crime Survey - 81% thought crime had risen
Left realism - the rising 'anti-social behaviour rate' (Young)
Due to:
Blurring the boundaries of crime
Subjective definitions
Flexibility - net is constantly widened to generate an almost endless number of infringements
Left realism - policing and control
The public must become more involved in determining the police's priorities and style of policing
Military policing - police rely on public info, but as people now distrust them , they have to rely on tactics like swamping an area or stop and searching, which often alienates or targets minorities
Left realism - government policy
Share similar ideas to New Labour and support their aims to protect vulnerable groups
Counter - Young calls these poor attempts at recreating the 1950s - 60s 'golden age' as it didn't lead to secure and permanent jobs
Left realism - criticisms
Henry and Milovanovic - fails to explain crimes of the powerful
Interactionalists - fails to explain offender's motives due to reliance of quantitative data
Assumes value consensus
Assumes all those deprived will commit
Comparing Right and left realism
Both see crime as a real problem and fear of crime as rational
Are on different ends of the political spectrum
RR - blame individuals lack of self control
LR - blame structural inequalities
RR - fix it with social order and tough stance against crime