Globalisation - global criminal economy (Castells)
Worth over £1 trillion a year
Trafficking
Cyber-crime
Green crimes
Money laundering
Drugs trade
Relies on demand from the rich west and the desperation of the poor supplying countries
Globalisation - risk consciousness
Risk is seen as global rather than tied to particular places
The increased movement of people has lead to anxieties among western countries to protect their borders
Caused by negative media coverage, like on immigration
Globalisation - capitalism and crime (Taylor)
Globalisation has allowed corps to switch manufacturing to low-wage countries, producing job insecurity, unemployment and poverty
The lack of jobs causes unemployed people to resort to crime
Allows the elite to move funds around the globe to avoid taxes
Globalisation - patterns of criminal organisation (Hobbs and Dunningham)
Crime organisation is linked t0 economic changes brought about by globalisation
Individuals with contacts act as a 'hub' and create a network, composed of other individuals seeking opportunities
Contrasts hierarchical mafia style of the past
Globalisation - glocal organisation (Hobbs and Dunningham)
Despite global networks, crime is still rooted in a local context
Individuals still need local contacts to find opportunities
Counter - their conclusion may not be generalisable to other criminal activity elsewhere
Globalisation - McMafia (Glenny)
Organisations that emerged in Russia following the fall of communism
Purley economic organisations formed to pursue self-interest
New capitalist class turned to the mafia to protect their wealth during the uncertain period
Meant crime was interlinked with the establishment of the new Russian capitalist class in the world economy
Green crime - global risk society (Beck)
Late modern society can now provide adequate resources for all
However, the massive increase in productivity and tech have created risks
These risks harm the entire globe, like global warming
Green crime - traditional criminology
National laws and regulations concerning the environment
Advantage of this typography is its clear and defined subject matter
Counter - accepts official definitions of environmental crime, which are shaped by the elite to serve their own interests
Green crime - green criminology
White - the proper subject of criminology is any action that harms the environment, even if no laws have been broken
Different countries have different laws, but this typography can be applied universally
Argue powerful groups manipulate laws for their own interests
Green crime - primary green crime (South)
Crimes that result directly from the destruction and degradation of the Earth's resources
Air pollution - carbon emissions growing 2% a year
Deforestation - between 1960 and 1990, 1/5 of the worlds rainforests destroyed
Species decline or animal abuse - 46% mammals at risk
Water pollution - 25 million deaths a year to contamination
Green crime - secondary green crime (South)
Crime that breaks laws set in place to protect the environment
Conflict with protestors - French secret service blew up a ship protesting against nuclear weapon testing, killing 1
Dumping hazardous waste - 28,500 rusting barrels of radioactive waste on seabed
Environmental discrimination - city planning that places minority communities closer to garbage dumps
Green crime - green criminology criticisms
Hard to define the boundaries of its field of study clearly
Deciding on morals is a matter of values and cannot be established objectively
State crimes - scale (Green and ward)
The state's enormous power gives it the potential to inflict harm on a huge scale
262 million people murdered by governments during 20th century
State crime - state as a source of law
Role is to define what is a criminal, uphold law and prosecute offenders
However, this power means the state can also conceal their own crimes
Undermines the system of justice and the public's faith in it
State crime - typography (McLaughlin)
Political crimes
Crimes by security and police forces
Economic crimes
Social and cultural crimes
State crime - corporate (Kramer and Michalowski)
State initiated - states direct or approve corporate crime, cost cutting at NASA led to killing of 7 astronauts
State facilitated - states fail to regulate and control corporate behaviour, making crime easier, state failed to inspect Deepwater Horizon oilrig that ended up killing 11 workers
State crime - war crimes
Illegal wars - Kramer and Michalowski argue that to justify the USAs invasion of Iraq in 2003 as self-defence, they made the false claim that the Iraqis had weapons of mass destruction
Crime during war - Whyte says the US illegally changed the constitution so that the economy could be privatised and they could seize oil
State crime - domestic law
State makes laws which allows them to carry out harmful acts
German Nazi state passed a law permitting it to compulsorily sterilise the disabled
Leads to inconsistencies, as an act my be legal on one side of a boarder and illegal on the other side
State crime - social harms and zemiology (Hillyard)
Zemiology - the study of harms, whether or not they are against the law
This definition prevents the state from ruling themselves out of the court
Also prevents different states laws as it overlooks all laws
Counter - has no indication on who should be the moral judge
State crime - labelling
Argues that whether an act is regarded as a crime depends on whether social audience defines it as such
State crime is socially constructed, and so what people regard as a state crime can vary over time and between cultures
Counter - no indication on who the relevant audience is, or that audience's definitions may be manipulated by ruling class ideology
State crime - international law (Rothe and Mullins)
Define a state crime as any action by a state that violates international law or the states own domestic law
Doesn't rely on sociologists own perception of harm
Intentionally designed to deal with state crime, unlike most domestic laws
Counter - international law is a social construct and focuses on war crimes rather than state corruption
State crime - human rights
Natural rights - the right to live, liberty and free speech
Civil rights - right to vote, privacy, fair trials and education
Schwendinger - state crime violates both
Risse - virtually all states care about their human rights image due to them being global social norms
Counter - Cohen says acts like economic exploitation is not self-evidently criminal, unlike torture which is clearly criminal
State crime - the authoritarian personality (Adorno)
Willingness to obey the orders of superiors without question
During WW2, many Germans suffered from this due to socialisation
Arendt - people who carry out torture and genocide aren't psychopaths but instead normal, found that Nazi war criminal Eichmann wasn't even antisemitic
State crime - crime of obedience
Research shows that many people are willing to obey authority even when this involves harming others
Green and Ward - most torturers are re-socialised with exposure to propaganda in order for them to do what they do without any effects
Kelman and Hamilton's typography:
Authorisation - acts are approved by authority
Routinisation - crimes are turned into routine
Dehumanisation - enemy portrayed as sub-human
State crime - modernity (Bauman)
Explanations for how the Holocaust happened:
A division of labour - each person responsible for a small task, so no one person felt responsible for the atrocity
Bureaucratisation - normalising the killing as a job by making it repetitive
Instrumental rationality - simple goals put in place to make task easier to comprehend
Science and technology - railways and gas chambers made process easier and automated
State crime - criticisms of modernity
Not all genocides were highly organised division of labour that allows participants to distance themselves from killing, for example the Rwanda genocide
Ignores the fact that propaganda made being Jewish not a social norm
State crime - the culture of denial (Cohen)
Due to rise in awareness, states now have to make a greater effort to conceal or justify their human rights crimes
Spiral of state denial:
Stage 1 - state claims it didn't happen
Stage 2 - state label it as something else, like self defence
Stage 3 - state claim it was justified
State crime - techniques of neutralisation (Sykes and Matza)