Cultural variations

Cards (8)

  • Cultural variations - The differences between western and non-western cultures and why their attachment styles may differ
  • Van Izendoorn's research
    > AIM - To investigate cross cultural variations in attachment
    > SAMPLE - 32 studies of the strange situation from 8 countries using around 2000 children
    > METHOD - Meta analysis of the strange situation
  • Most common attachment types
    > Secure - UK (75%), Sweden (74%)
    > Insecure avoidant - Germany (35%), Holland (26%)
    > Insecure resistant - Israel (29%), Japan (27%)
    Least common attachment types
    > Secure - China (50%), Germany (57%)
    > Insecure avoidant - Japan (5%), Israel (7%)
    > Insecure resistant - UK (3%), Sweden (4%)
  • Van Izendoorn FINDINGS
    > Most common attachment types in all countries was secure
    > Insecure resistant was the most dominant insecure type in non-western cultures
    > Insecure avoidant was most dominant in western cultures
    > One and a half times more variation within cultures then between cultures
  • Van Izendoorn CONCLUSION
    > There are cultural variations in attachment as insecure types were different
    > Must be similarities due to secure attachment being most common in all cultures
  • Cultural variations AO3
    :) High population validity
    > Meta-analysis of 32 strange situation studies
    > 2000 infants
    > Making it easier to generalise the findings to the target population, increasing the internal validity
  • Cultural variations AO3
    :( Culture bias
    > Over half (18 out of 32) of the research studies were carried out in the USA
    > Only 5 carried out in non-western cultures
    > Difficult to generalise the findings across all cultures when explaining different attachment types
  • Cultural variations AO3
    :( Imposed Etic
    > Based on american child-rearing practices and ignores other cultures
    > eg. the lack of separation anxiety indicates an insecure-avoidant attachment type, in germany this would be seen in a positive light as it shows independence
    > Therefore the strange situation may not be appropriate to measure attachment types across all cultures