a repeated game strategy for player i specifies an action (pure or mixed) in each period t as a function of the history at t
Payoff: discounted present value of stage-game payoffs, where the discount is the probability of repetition times the discount factor
ADV: (1-delta) times today's payoff plus delta times ADV of continuation play
v is a feasible average discounted payoff of the repeated stage game if it is part of the convex hull
a payoff is individually rational if it offers a payoff at least as great as their minimax payoff
Folk Theorem: if a payoff v is in the feasible and rational set, there exists a discount factor such that the infinitely repeated game has a Nash equilibrium where each player's ADV equals vi
Friedman (1971) theorem: suppose v is a feasible payoff vector such that for all i, vi exceeds players i's payoff in some NE of the stage game. For discount factor sufficiently close to 1 there is a subgame perfect equilibrium of the infinitely repeated game with ADV v
one-shot deviation principle: a proposed strategy profile is SPE if, and only if, no player has an incentive to deviate at any state while obeying the transitions denoted in an automaton
Fudenberg and Maskin (1986) Perfect Folk Theorem: assume V* is n-dimensional. For any payoff v in V* there is a discount value such that for all discount rates lower than it, the infinitely repeated subgame has a subgame perfect equilibrium with average discounted payoffs v1 up to vn
Criticism towards repeated game SPE with 'punishment phases': both players are worse off at the beginning of a punishment phase, so they may want to renegotiate it
Weak renegotiation proofness: no continuation play in the 'book of plays' is Pareto dominated by any other
Farrell and Maskin (1989) have a Folk Theorem for renegotiation-proof SPE
Benoit and Krishna (1985) - finite repetition expands the set of SPE if the stage game has multiple Nash equilibria ranked differently by the players
Imperfect public monitoring: past actions are unobservable, but there are public signals that are imperfectly correlated with aggregate action
Cooperative equilibria may still be constructed under imperfect public monitoring using trigger strategies
what makes collusion harder?
leniency towards whistleblowers, business cycles, imperfect information, differentiation of products