Single indicators are too broad they are averages which disguise wide internal variations. For example, a few very wealthy families but the majority of the population may be living at subsistence level
Subsistence agriculture and ‘barter economies’ are not included in wealth indicators
Some regions/areas of a country may be much better off than others — north-south’ or ‘urban-rural’ contrasts
High GNI figures do not show where the money is being spent. it may not be going to improve health and education
Exchange rates fluctuate making comparison unreliable
Certain indicators are perhaps irrelevant to the real quality of life in many poorer developing countries
HDI is a combination of health, wealth and education indicators as a combination it is a more balanced view of development.
Using HDI is better as it prevents extremes within the country from giving a false indication of development some oil rich countries are rich but not developed