weber - saw both structural and action theories as needed for a full understanding of human behaviour as an adequate sociological explanation involves two levels
cause - explaining objective structural factors that shape behaviour
meaning - understanding subjective meanings that individuals attach to their actions
eg. at the causal level the protestant reformation developed a new denomination - calvinism - that changed people's worldview, but at the meaning level work took on a meaning as their calling so people accumulated wealth
types of action
weber - there are an infinite number of meanings people may give their actions but they can be classified in four ways
instrumentally rational action
value-rational action
traditional action
affectual action
instrumentally rational action
weber - the actor calculates the most effective way to achieve their goal eg. a capitalist calculating that the most efficient way to maximise profit is to pay low wages
about the most efficient way of reaching a goal, even if the goal itself isn't desirable
value-rational action
weber - action towards a goal the actor regards as desirable for their own sake eg. worshipping god in order to go to heaven
no way of calculating if the means of obtaining this goal are effective
traditional action
weber - customary or routine action
this action isn't rational as there is no conscious thought or action behind it
affectual action
weber - action that expresses emotion eg. weeping out of grief or violence sparked by anger
important in religious and political movements with charismatic leaders
evaluation of weber
valuable to criticise structuralist theories eg. functionalism HOWEVER
schutz - the view is too individualistic and can't explain shared natures of meaning eg. everyone understanding the meaning of gestures
typology is difficult to apply - trading on trobriand islands could be seen as traditional or instrumentally rational
advocated for verstahen, something that can never be fully experienced