The National Curriculum is the framework that sets out what children are expected to know, understand or be able to do at different stages of their education.
The National Curriculum was introduced by the Education Reform Act (1988) as part of the Conservative government's drive towards greater accountability and standardisation in schools.
The National Curriculum covers subjects such as English, mathematics, science, history, geography, art and design, music, physical education, computing, modern foreign languages, religious education, citizenship, and careers guidance.
All governments are interested in education
Forster Education Act introduced elementary schooling for 5-10 year olds in England and Wales
1870
1944 Education Act
1. Introduced the Tripartite System and the 11+
2. Made secondary schools free for all and raised the leaving age to 15
Before the Second World War, many poor people couldn't afford secondary education because it wasn't free
Types of schools in the Tripartite System
Grammar schools
Secondary modern schools
Technical schools
Grammar schools
For the able kids who passed the 11+
Pupils were taught traditional subjects ready for university
About 20% of kids got in
Secondary modern schools
For the 75-80% of pupils who failed the 11+
Offered basic education
Technical schools
Meant to provide a more vocational education for those pupils with aptitude for practical subjects
The Tripartite System aimed to improve the education of all children, but several problems remained
The 11+ didn't necessarily measure intelligence, it was culturally biased and suited the middle class more than the working class
The 11+ actually legitimised social class inequality, by incorporating it into a system
Few technical schools were built, so the vocational part of the plan didn't work that well
Grammar schools were seen as the best, even though the schools were supposed to have 'parity of esteem'
Kids who failed the 11+ were labelled as failures, which sometimes turned them off education
If well-off middle class pupils failed, their parents could still afford to send them to private schools
1965 Labour Government made schools comprehensive
Local Education Authorities reorganised most schools so that everyone had equality of opportunity
Comprehensive schools
No 11+, so 80% of the school population don't get labelled as failures
High-ability pupils generally still do well
Lower ability pupils do better than in the old secondary moderns
Comprehensive schooling hasn't achieved equality of opportunity
Schools tend to be 'single-class', depending on the local area
Where people can afford to live (and how good the local schools are) is important in educational attainment
1976 Push for Vocational Education started
1. Labour Prime Minister James Callaghan said British education and industry was in decline because schools didn't teach people the skills they needed in work
2. All governments since then have had policies designed to create a closer link between school and work
Vocational reforms
Youth Training Schemes (YTS) started in 1983
NVQs (1986) and GNVQs (1992) were introduced
The New Deal, introduced in 1998, meant people on benefits had to attend courses if they didn't accept work
Some sociologists argue that vocational education aims to teach good work discipline, not skills
The vocational education system took a largely functionalist approach (based on the ideas of role allocation)
David (1993) describes the situation as a 'parentocracy', because the power in education is held by parents, rather than by teachers and schools
Most comprehensive schools still sort pupils into streams or sets depending on test scores, so it's still possible to feel like a failure without the 11+
Comprehensives in working-class areas have worse GCSE results than those in middle-class areas
1988 Education Reform Act
1. Widened choice within the education system
2. Encouraged more competition to create a 'market' in schools (marketisation)
3. Introduced more vocational courses and more work placement schemes
4. Introduced a National Curriculum of compulsory subjects for all 5- to 16-year-olds
5. Established OFSTED to inspect schools
6. Allowed schools to opt out of their local education authority and become grant-maintained schools
7. Allowed parents to choose which school to send their child to
8. Introduced league tables to help parents choose schools
9. Increased testing and exams for pupils
Sociologists like Whitty (1998) argue that middle-class parents have an advantage in an educational market
Constant testing can be stressful for students, and can encourage labelling and self-fulfilling prophecies
Ball (1995) claimed that the new National Curriculum was the 'curriculum of the dead', because its emphasis on the core subjects was outdated