Althusser suggested the ruling class controlled the proletariat through ideological state apparatuses and repressive state apparatuses
Ideological State Apparatus - passive control that influences people's thoughts so they won't rebel. Institutions like education and the family teach obedience and hard work
Repressive State Apparatus - some people reject the ISA and so social control must be maintained through force. Police and legal system go against a person's will to maintain the status quo
Police responses to the 2011 riots and BLM protests are examples of RSA
Althusser's ideas were entirely theoretical and not based on evidence - he was an armchair theorist
Some people reject ruling class ideology but continue to conform
Bonger said that capitalism was inherently criminogenic
Capitalism promotes goods and services that it says everyone should have, but keeps wages low to maximise profit, creating false needs that people cannot afford - and so they turn to crime
Chambliss found that crime was present in all social classes, but the means to commit them were different
The working class have limited means so turn to release frustration through violence and targeting weaker individuals
The ruling class have unlimited means and can utilise these for more subtle types of crime, like false accounting or embezzlement
Gordon said capitalism created a 'dog eat dog' society where everyone turned to crime to try and get ahead - it is a rational response to competition
Mankoff said there were lower rates of crime in Europe than in the USA due to higher spending on the welfare state
Snider said the pressure on constant growth encourages corporate crime - companies will break the law to post higher profits
Snider also found that corporate crime cost the US $325 billion per year, compared to only $4 billion from street crime, and yet the former was invisible in the public eye
Criminogenic capitalism does not explain why working class criminals do not exclusively target the ruling class
Chambliss said a key function of law was to protect private property from the masses
Many large companies lobby to have laws passed that act in their interests
Criminalising theft, trespass and copyright means the ruling class can continue to make profit - eg Disney lobbying to extend copyright to 95 years
Snider says the state is reluctant to pass laws that harm businesses, because unemployment is unpopular with voters
Pearce says legislation that protects employees is a smokescreen that presents a caring face of capitalism
Gordon says occasional prosecution of corporate crime gives the impression that the justice system is fair
Taylor et al in The New Criminology proposed that crime was influenced by both structural forces and individual agency
Fully Social theory outline 6 factors when considering a crime
Origins of the deviant act: immediate, meaning particular circumstances for an individual, and wider, meaning power structures and inequality in society
Actual act of deviance: what meaning did the individual have for the act
Origins of social reaction: immediate, meaning how those connected to the individual react, and wider, meaning how the rest of society reacts
Impact of reactions on future behaviour: will the person become labelled or influenced by reactions?
Fully Social theory is idealistic and suggests crime is revenge against inequality, and also might be overly complicated