Save
...
Criminal law
Non Fatals
Common Assault
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
leahlew1s
Visit profile
Subdecks (1)
Cases
law > Criminal law > Non Fatals > Common Assault
12 cards
Cards (33)
Definition of
assault
Act which causes the victim to
apprehend immediate unlawful violence
E.g. Raising a fist or making a threat
AR of assault
There must be an
act
Victim must apprehend
immediate unlawful
force
R v
Lamb
Definition of
battery
The application of
unlawful force
to
another person
Even touching victims
clothes
can be sufficient (R v
Thomas)
AR of
Battery
Application
of
unlawful force
to another
Collins
v
Wilcock
Continuing act
Battery
may be committed through
continuing act
Fagan
v
Met police commissioner
Indirect act
Battery
can be through
indirect act
e.g.
booby trap
DPP
v
K
Omission
Criminal liability can arise from an
omission
but only if the defendant is under a
duty
to act.
DPP
v
Santa
Bermudez
Battery
without an
assault
Occurs when the victim is
unaware
that
unlawful
force is about to be used on them e.g. coming form
behind
them
MR of Assault
Intention
to cause another to fear
immediate
unlawful
violence or recklessness
MR of a
Battery
Intention
to apply
unlawful
force to another or
recklessness
Actual Bodily Harm
Offences Against the Persons Act
1861
under
s47
AR of ABH
s47
Assault
or
battery
needs to be present
Miller
- 'any hurt or injury calculated to
interfere
with the health or comfort of the victim'
Examples of ABH
Bruising
,
grazes
, scratches, minor fractures, psychological harm
DPP
v
Smith
(2006)
MR of ABH
s47
Same as MR for
common assault
No need to intend to be
reckless
GBH
s20
1861-
malicious wounding/inflicting grievous bodily harm
Maximum
sentence of
5
years
Wound
Cut or break in the
continuity
of the whole
skin
Does not include
internal bleeding
or
scratches
Grievous
Bodily Harm
Serious
Harm
R
v
Dica
Inflicting GBH
In
R
v
Burstow
it was decided that
'inflict'
does not require assault or
battery
MR of
s20
GBH
An
intention
to do harm that was done or
recklessness
(no need for
harm
to be foreseen- R v
Parameter)
Evaluation
Out of Date-
150
years old (
1861
), mental health considered more today
Inconsistency
between offences -
Sentencing
is the same for abh and s20 even though s20 is a lot more serious
Need for modern, simplified language - the meaning of
maliciously
has changed
Evaluation
pt2
Law
commission
report :
There should be a clear hierarchy of offences reflecting
- harm caused
-culpability of D
-maximum
penalty
There should be:
aggravated
assault
physical
assault
threatened
assault
assault intending to
resist
arrest
See all 33 cards