Peer review is a process that takes place before a study is published to ensure that the research is of a high-quality, contributes to the field of research and is accurately presented
The process is carried out by experts in the related field of research
Research findings are then publicised during conferences and in journals
Main aims of peer review:
to allocate research funding
To validate the quality and relevance of the research
To suggest amendments
Allocating research funding:
helps to decide whether to fund the research proposal
can be government-run funding organisations
To validate the quality and relevance of research:
assesses elements of research for quality and accuracy such as the hypotheses, methodology, statistical tests and conclusions
Suggest amendments:
may suggest minor revisions to improve the report
in extreme cases, the report may be inappropriate for publishing and will be withdrawn
Evaluation of peer review:
anonymity
publication bias
burying ground-breaking research
Anonymity:
produces more honest appraisal
can lead to rival researchers criticising competition so they get the research funding
Publication bias:
publications want to increase their credibility and circulation by only publishing significant, "head grabbing" research
filedrawer problem- publish positive results
Burying ground-breaking research:
suppress opposing research to maintain a status-quo
Reviewers favour research that supports theirs and are more critical of contradictory work
can slow down the rate of change within a scientific discipline