High culture is considered to be important and valuable, usually enjoyed by the ruling class. Art, literature, theatre, opera, ballet etc
Folk culture is local or regional culture based in tradition, like Irish Dancing or Morris Dancing. It might be being replaced by popular culture
Popular culture reflects the culture shared by a majority of people - it may be mass produced and is often considered lesser or dumbed down
It might be elitist to suggest popular culture is dumber - what makes it any less important?
Marxists say popular culture serves to distract the masses from their exploitation
Some forms of high culture are being popularised and absorbed into pop culture
Globalisation has allowed for greater cultural homogeneity, where we all share the same culture
Jenkins says participatory culture has been enhanced by new media, allowing individuals across the world to shape the media themselves and form new communities
Cohen and Kennedy say we don't abandon local culture just because of globalisation. Instead, global culture is mixed and matched with local culture - this is called glocalisation
Strinati says the line between high and popular culture is becoming blurred, and that people can shape their identities through the media they consume
Murthy says younger generations utilise social media sites to raise awareness of political issues and co-ordinate efforts, creating a global protest e.g. spreading awareness of the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza
There might be a hybridisation of culture happening, where pop culture and folk culture are combining. For example Bollywood, which combines Indian and Western culture
Some would argue globalisation is causing cultural imperialism, where Western culture is dominating and erasing folk culture across the world
McBride says cultural imperialism creates a ready market for Western goods because Western culture seeps into every part of the world
Some say we are experiencing specifically Americanisation - consider Halloween or school proms which are now part of UK culture too
Ritzer speaks of McDonaldisation - companies are the exact same everywhere. You could travel to most countries and never have to eat local cuisine
TNCs might be more powerful than governments
Klein identifies an increase in cultural homogenisation, where local culture is killed and we're indoctrinated into one single culture
Commodity fetishism - we no longer see the social links behind products, only the products. Know nothing about who was behind it
Conspicuous consumption - people will buy the most expensive luxury versions of products even if they have the same functionality, because people attach higher status to them
False needs are things people think they need that they actually don't, that companies use to encourage consumption - these can be abstract eg social status or physical eg a smart fridge