giddens - there is a duality of structure, and structure and agency are two sides of the same coin that can't exist without the other
through actions we produce and reproduce structures, which make our actions possible
eg. a language is a structure of grammar and vocabulary, but would not exist if noone used it
reproduction of structure through agency
giddens - structure has two elements
rules - norms, customs and laws that govern action
resources - both economic and power over others
these can be reproduced by human action eg. obeying the law reinforces it, which is generally what our actions do
rules contain knowledge about how to live our lives, which we use resources to do
we also have a deep need for ontological security - the feeling that the world is as it appears to be, which encourages action that reproduces structure
change of structure through agency
giddens - action can also change structure, which it does in one of two ways
we 'reflexively monitor' our action and reflect on it and its results so we can deliberately choose a new course if necessary. this is more common in late modern society where tradition has a much smaller impact on action
actions may change the world in a different way to the one we intended eg. the unforseen consequences of the protestant reformation leading to capitalism
evaluation
giddens makes an important attempt to overcome divisions between structure and action HOWEVER
archer - underestimates the capacity of structures to resist change eg. the poor may wish to abolish poverty but lack the power to do so
craib - isn't a real theory because it describes the things we find when we study society rather than what happens in society
craib - fails to unite structure and action and reduces structure to governing everyday behaviour without explaining how the theory applies to larger structures like economy