Pettit et al (1988) studied playgroups of children and observed how aggression played an important role in the development of some children's dominance over others
Tinbergen found male fish are highly territorial during mating season, developing a red spot on their underbelly. If a male enters their territory, it triggers their FAP. The sign stimulus is the red spot.
Researchers used wooden fish with a red spot and the male fish would be violent towards it, regardless of the shape, as the red spot was the sign stimulus.
Nisbett (1993) found that there was a North-South divide in the USA for homicide rates, with killing being more common in white males from the south than white males in the North.
Goodall conducted observations of chimpanzees that challenged the view that aggression has evolved into a relatively physically harmless ritual. The chimpanzees were aggressive no matter the signals presented.
Aggressive behaviour is an innate feature of humans and animals, studied in their natural environments. Aggression is an adaptive function focused on survival, such as gaining territory, resources and dominance in the social hierarchy.
A major factor of male aggression due to paternity uncertainty and the threat of cuckoldry. Men have evolved psychological mechanisms to increase anti-cuckoldry behaviours.
Aggressive behaviour to increase one's own chance of survival by promoting their health and creating opportunities for reproduction. Characteristics associated with bullying are attractive to women.
Rigby's review of anti-bullying interventions found that bullying was still prevalent, suggesting the evolutionary approach of increasing the cost of bullying and rewarding alternative behaviours is more effective.
Campbell argues that females with offspring are less likely to be physically aggressive because such behaviour would risk their own and their child's survival, leading them to use verbal aggression instead.
The frustration-aggression hypothesis suggests that anger, hostility and violence are always the outcome when we are prevented from achieving our goals.
Green found that participants who were insulted gave the strongest shocks, then the interfered group, then the impossible tasks group, all more than the control group.
A meta-analysis found that participants who were provoked but unable to retaliate directly were significantly more likely to aggress against an innocent party.