One strength of both approaches is they fit the aims of science. For example, the processes involved in nomothetic research are like natural sciences e.g establishing objectivity through standardisation, control and statistical testing. Researchers also use an idiographic approach to objectify their methods e.g triangulation is used as a way of increasing validity. Additionally, modern qualitative researchers reflect upon their biases as part of the research process, known as reflexivity. Therefore this suggests that both the nomothetic and idiographic approaches raise psychology’s status as a science.