memory variable studies

Cards (10)

  • Who studied duration?
    • Peterson and Peterson - trigrams + counting backwards
    • Bahrick et al - yearbook
  • Outline Bahrick et al's study- Yearbook

    • Tested the LTM of 392 participants.
    • Tested 15 years, 30 years, and 48 years after graduation.
    • Tested free recall, photo recognition and name recognition
  • What were the findings of Bahrick et al's study?
    • 30 years after graduation:
    • There was only 30% accuracy for free recall.
    • 48 years after graduation:
    • Name-recognition was 80% accurate.
    • Photo-recognition was 40% accurate.
    • Overall, through the years recognition was more accurate than recall.
  • Outline Peterson and Peterson's study - counting backwards

    • Laboratory experiment.
    • 24 psychology students
    • Recall random trigrams after intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 seconds).
    • Had to count backward - stopped maintenance rehearsal
  • What were the findings of Peterson and Peterson?
    Participants could recall fewer trigrams as the time gap increased.
    • 3-second interval - 80% correctly.
    • 6-second interval - 50% correctly.
    • 18-second interval - 10% correctly.
  • Outline sperling - grid recall
    • Showed the participants a grid of letters (three rows of four letters) for 0.05 seconds (50 milliseconds).
    • There were two different scenarios:
    • Recall the whole grid.
    • Recall a single row.
  • What were the findings of the Sperling - grid recall?

    • First scenario - recall the whole grid:
    • four or five letters out of a total of 12 letters.
    • Second scenario - recall a single row:
    • 3 out of 4 letters recalled
    • Suggests the STM is finite
  • Who studied capacity?
    Sperling - grid recall
    Jacobs - sequencing
  • What shape is Murdock's 'serial position curve'
    U shaped
  • What is the Murdock - serial position curve?

    • the probability of recalling any word depended on its position in the list
    • early in the list (the primacy effect)
    • end of the list (the recency effect)
    • were more often recalled, but the ones in the middle were more often forgotten.