Locke believed a minimal, or nightwatchman state, was crucial as a stateless society is one devoid of freedom. The state's only job should be to protect negative freedom - freedom from interference.
Locke believed that society was individualistic and that the rights of the individual should be at the centre of society.
Locke believed that humans were naturally rational and guided by the pursuit of self-interest, yet mindful of others' concern.
Locke rejected the divine right to govern and the state actually needs consent from the governed and people should bare the means to overthrow government if they wish.
Locke believed in laissez faire economics and that state policy should be to respect the natural right to private property.
Mary Wollstonecraft commented that intellectually, men and women were not that different. They can both act in an equal way.
Wollstonecraft believed that men were truly prepared in society whilst women were not and that women should be independent not dependant on their husbands (divine right of husbands).
Wollstonecraft believed that a free market economy would be energised by free women.
John Stuart Mill's harm principle depicts that the actions of individuals should only be limited to prevent harm to others.
Mill believed the larger the state the more it would threaten freedom and negative liberty.
In 'On Liberty', Mill wrote that the only time power can be exercised by the state is to prevent harm to others and enforce the harm principle.
Mill believed in representative democracy and a plural voting system - if you went to university you should get six votes.
Mill also believed that human nature was fundamentally rational but there was room for humans to grow.
Mill believed in laissez faire economics and that equal taxation penalises the rich as they worked harder so deserved more.
Rawls believed the economy should be tempered as the state has an obligation to enhance the poorest citizens.
John Rawls believed in an enabling state to protect positive liberty and give citizens the opportunity to grow.
Rawls believed that there should be equality of opportunity in society because of the veil of ignorance - those born with disadvantages should have the same opportunities as others.
Rawls' view on human nature was that mankind is selfish yet empathetic and values both individual liberty as well as the plight of those around them.
Rawls believed the state had a duty for public spending and services as it needed to guarantee equality of opportunity.
Betty Friedan believed the state be an enabling state, in particular legislate on rights to protect women.
Friedan wrote in The Feminine Mystique that society condemnded women more than human nature and transmitted these via 'cultural channels' and Friedan wanted to challenge this.
Friedan believed in positive liberty for women in that they should be able to choose their own career path rather than be confined to the private sector.
John Rawls believed in the importance of owning private property as he wanted a 'property-owning democracy' to create a more equal society.