Winning the game is more important than playing by the rules
Marxists argue he doesn't take into account whos interests these goals are in (the bourgeoisies')
Strain theory and crime - paragraph two?
Merton - 5 responses to strain
Individuals respond differently depending on which goals and means they accept
Five types: rebellion / ritualism / innovation / conformity...
Retreatism: reject both goals and means, social dropouts eg drug addicts
Doesn't explain non-utilitarian crime
Strain theory and crime - paragraph three?
Cohen - status frustration
Alternative status hierarchy, delinquent subculture inverts mainstream society
Whatever society condemns, they praise
Regular school attendance - vandalising property / truancy, offers boys an alternative way to seek opportunity
Good for explaining non-utilitarian crime
Assumes everyone shares the same values
Strain theory and crime - paragraph four?
Cloward and Ohlin - three subcultures
Not just unequal opportunity to legitimate opportunities but illegit too
Not every school failure is an expert safecracker
Leads to criminal / conflict / retreatist subcultures
Retreatists - illegal drug use, double failures
Boundaries drawn too sharply
Drug trade is a mix of disorganised crime / conflict and professional mafia crime / disorganised crime
Strain theory and crime - paragraph five?
Miller - working class subculture
Working class has an independent subculture with its own values, doesn't value success
Members not frustrated by failure
Wider deviance in this class, but an attempt to achieve their own goals, not mainstream ones
Durkheim: crime is inevitable, not everyone is equally socialised into norms and values, but they are all shared
Labelling theories and crime - paragraph one?
Deviant career / master status
Once labelled, one accrues a master status
Deviant career suggests the labelling process and societal reaction creates a self-fulfilling prophecy (Becker)
Malinowski's study on incestual islanders
Too deterministic - doesn't recognise the personal choice in crime / not everyone accepts their label
Right realists - rational choice theory
Labelling theories and crime - paragraph two?
Selective law enforcement
Labelling theory - agencies of social control use considerable discretion / selective judgement in deciding whether and how to deal with illegal / deviant behaviour
Becker: police operate with preconceptions
Leads highly policed areas to feel targeted, hostile and thus deviant
Cicourel: police arrest on their view of a 'typical delinquent'
Fails to explain why they have this image, the New Right suggest it is just true
Labelling theories and crime - paragraph three?
Primary and Secondarydeviance
Acting in an isolated way is primary deviance
Societal reaction can lead to secondary deviance
Label applies and internalised, subsequent deviance is secondary
Lemert - stuttering in Native American communities
Stuttering was an act of secondary deviance
Emphasis on it happening caused it to happen
Cohen - deviance is a sign an institution is failing
Labelling theories and crime - paragraph four?
Interactionist view on media
Media labels through symbols (race, leather) and chooses what to report
Exaggeration / distortion / predictions are used to make more interesting news
Cohen - moral panics - mods and rockers
McRobbie and Thornton: late modernity - moral panics are now routine, less impact
Little consensus on what is deviant eg single parenthood so harder to make a moral panic
Labelling theories and crime - paragraph five?
Interactionist policy
Labelling theorists: rule-breaking is widespread and largely inconsequential until labelling
Once labelling occurs, offending is likely to become more harmful
Proposes reducing labelling through decriminalisation and reducing secondary deviance
Braithwaite: reintegrative shaming
Critics suggest effects of reintegrative shaming are dependant on cultural / individual factors - it is not always applicable