an individual or group can ‘letoffsteam’ to preventworsedeviance.
EvaluatingDurkheim
studied the functionality of crime and deviance
count the anomic society (morally questioning behaviour)
cons -
doesn’t explain why he thinks crime happens, is stereotypicalin his reasoning
doesn’t explain why some do more crime than others
doesn’texplain the reasonforvariety in deviance
doesn’tconsidernegativeimpacts of deviance onsociety
Merton (1938)
Strain Theory
individuals experience a disconnectbetweenculturallyapprovedgoalsandthemeansavailabletoachievethem - this gap creates “strain”, prompting some people to adapt
conformity, accepting both goals and means
innovation, accepting goals but using unapproved means
ritualism, abandoning goals but rigidly following means - being “stuck in a rut”
retreatism, rejecting both goals and means
rebellion, reject goals and means - aim to create new ones
Cons of Merton’s strain theory
assumes that the goaloffinalsuccess is universal
an individual may fall into several categories at different points (eg. businessman on weekdays,druguser on weekends)
Recorded crime statistics- Functionalists
Social Facts - externalinfluence, eg. family background
quantitativedata seen as reliable
value consensus, see police as representing all of us (doesnotquestion their motives)
Structural Functionalism
societyworkstogether for social order
drug cartels as a responsetosocial and economicdysfunctions, they provideeconomicbenefits and socialmobilityto the marginalised
Functionalists
the effect on individuals is not as important as the effects on society as a whole
deviance can be functional as it serves a purpose, eg. war eradicates bad people
Functionalism - Durkheim
value consensus - share norms and values to reduce chaos (“anomie”).
Agnew (2006) - General Strain Theory
crime as a coping mechanism, eg. due to lack of financial success, abuse, social isolation