observation of behaviour in participants own environment
Structured observation
Observation in a researcher controlled environment
Participan observation
a form of observation where the researcher takes an active role in situation being observed
Non participant observation
a form of observation where the researcher observes behaviour of others but does not form form part of group study
Covert observation
a form of observation were the participants do not know they are being observed
Overt observation
a form of observation where those being observed are aware of the presents of an observer
Weakness of naturalistic observation: Difficulty gaining information especially specific information
Weakness of structured observation: Difficulty to see if behaviour would be the same in a real life situation
Weakness in participant observation: difficulty taking notes and recording data
Weakness in non participant observation: Participants behaviour may be affected due to presence of observer
Weakness in covert observation : Problematic in ethical terms due to participants not being aware
Weakness in overt observation: Participants may change behaviour when they know they are being observed
Strength in naturalistic:Gains real insight into a person’s behaviour in a real life situation
Strength in structured observation :Easier to gain numerical data from structured observations, more reliable than naturalistic
Strength in participant observation : No stranger involved could impact how participants react in certain situations, might picked up data missed by other methods
strength in non participant observation : Allow better recording of data
Strength in covert observation: Unlikely for participant to change behaviour making the observations more valid
strength In overt : Enables participants the ability to consent