can act masc in some situations, and fem in others.
bem (1974):
developed the androgynous hypothesis which stated that as a positive and desirable condition.
constructed an inventory to investigate male & female traits.
what did bem find?
that men scored more highly on traits that were rated as being masc and females rated highly on fem traits.
however, it was more common to be androgynous than to be either extremely fem or masc.
research suggests that androgyny can lead to increase in positive mental health.
limitations of bem:
respondents likely to give answers that are socially desirable (demand characteristics).
subjective- androgyny may not always be positive. the scale itself (1-7); people may interpret scale differently, as they are her ideas of masculinity & femininity.
simplistic- reducing masc & fem down to single scores/personality characteristics.
respondents need to be honest/aware of their own personality.
cognitive explanations of androgyny- gender schema theory:
according to bem, when faced w/a decision on how to act, a traditionally sex-typed person (e.g. female w/a feminine typed behaviour) would act in a way that would be appropriate to their gender because of an existing gender schema.
according to bem, how would an androgynous person decide to act?
would have a different cognitive style and adopt behaviours, when necessary, that are independent of gender concepts.
androgynous people are gender aschematic = not influenced by sex-role stereotypes/perceive the world w/out them.
according to orlofsky (1977) how could androgynous behaviour develop (behavioural explanation)?
learned through reinforcement, allowing individuals to acquire masc and fem qualities applicable to diff situations.
outline burchardt & serbin’s (1982) study (research to support androgyny):
aim: to see whether androgynous p’s in psychiatric units and in the lay (normal) pop. have a more positive mental health.
method: 106 fem, 84 male (undergraduates), 48 fem & 48 male (psychiatric patients).
sample: all p’s were administered the BRSI and the FAMMPI, in order to be classified as masc, fem, androgynous or undifferentiated personalities.
results of burchardt & serbin’s study?
androgynous females scored sig. lower for depression and social introversion than fem females, in college sample were also lower on the SZ and mania scales than masc females.
hospitalised male sample- pattern was partially sustained w/androgynous masc p’s sig. less deviant than fem males, and lower in depression.
in the group of college males, androgynous males scored lower on social introversion than fem males.
conclusion of burchardt & serbin’s study:
being androgynous is positively correlated w/good mental health, especially concerning levels of depression.
evaluate one aspect of the method used in the BRSI:
has good test-retest reliability.
produces consistent results when used in different occasions w/the same p’s.
this is a strength because it demonstrates that the BSRI is an effective & reliable way of assessing levels of androgyny; masc & fem.