Supporting evidence- Hazan and shaver59% secure, 19% resistant, 25% avoidant supports IWM however data is biased bcs self reports more research needs doing
Contrasting evidence- hodges and Tizard7 year olds in orphanages had secure and close attachments bcs they were cared for. Critical period no sensitive period yes
Contrasting evidence Schaffer and EmersonGlasgow infants had multiple attachments, disproves monotrophy
Strange situationRCLI
reliable measure standardised procedure8 eps3 mins
Contradicting evidence from TakahashiJapanese infants only appear resistant bcs they’re never left alone, Strange situation ignores cultures
Low ecological validity script plus babies only cry due to unfamiliar conditions
Incomplete explanationMain and SolomonInsecure disorganised
Cultural variations
reliable way to test for secure attachment bcs all findings suggest that (takahashi and van)
Ethnocentric bcs strange situation was developed in America
Definitions of culture must be considered. van compared entire countries not cultures. Talk about Japan
Sample bias bcs Van used half American studies and the japanese sample size was only one