penile penetration of the victim’s vagina, anus or mouth
without consent
mens rea of rape:
intention to penetrate
lack of reasonable belief in consent
The law does not require that lack of consent should be communicated or demonstrated to the defendant -> Hysa
s76: conclusive presumption
there can be no consent and no belief in consent
s75: evidential presumption
the defence has to prove that there was consent and/or belief in consent
s74: general definition
the prosecution has to prove that there was no consent and/or no belief in consent
s76
applies in situations where consent was gained by deception
s75
applies in six situations where the victim may have been given consent but the law considers it may not be valid
deception to the nature of the act: s76(1)(a)
defendant has deceived the victim so that she believes what she is doing is something other than intercourse
Williams
deception to the purpose of the act: s76(1)(a)
defendant has deceived the victim so that she is misled about why she is performing a sexual act
Devonald
deception to the identity of the defendant s76(1)(b):
defendant has deceived the victim so that she is misled about the person with whom she is having sexual activity. Must be deception as to who the person is rather than some other sort of characteristic.
s75 situations:
v was subject to/in fear of violence
violence was used or threatened against any other person
v was unlawfully detained at the time
v was asleep or unconscious
v was not able to communicate due to physical disability
substance administered to v which stupefied them
drunken consent is still consent
Bree
actus reus of assault by penetration (s2):
penetration of the vagina or anus of v with a part of the d's body or anything else