Joseph wolpe1958 based on the principles of classical conditioning
what is counter conditioning?
learning behaviours which appose previous learning. in this case learning to associate the phobic object/situation with relaxing
what is reciprocal inhibition?
we can't feel 2 of the opposite emotions at the same time therefore fear is replaced by a state of relaxing
what are anxiety hierarchies?
a model that the client produces - a list of situations describing the increasing levels of anxiety the phobia will create e.g bottom looking at a picture of a spider top holding a spider
what relaxation techniques are used?
learning progressive muscle and breathing techniques
what is exposure in this application?
exposing the client to the anxiety hierarchy slowly - achieve state before moving on to the next.
what are the 4 main features of the treatment?
relaxation
anxiety hierarchy
exposure
reinforcing of achievement & self efficacy
what is in vivo exposure?
directly confronting the phobia if possible
what is in vitro exposure?
rather than actually exposing the client directly to the feared object or situation the client uses imagery to imagine it
what is reinforcing achievement and self efficacy?
rewarding the state of relaxation with each item of fear. intention to create self efficacy
what is self efficacy
belief that they can and are in control of the outcome of the situation
How many patients did Wolpe 1998 claim he cured or improved after 25-30 sessions?
80-90%
how many patients did McGarth et al 1990 claim he cured?
75% individuals responded well to the therapy
what was the good appropriateness for the treatment of phobias?
only appropriate for some of the treatments - like simple phobias
what was the bad appropriateness for the treatment of phobias?
not appropriate for other mental health disorders or not simple phobias - generalised anxiety disorder and schizophrenia
what is the good practicality?
easy to train people to deliver systematic desensitisation and easy to treat people with the straight forward phobias
also less traumatic than flooding as a treatment - so less likely rto drop out of the treatment
what is bad practicality?
practical problems with the vivo exposure - social phobias, you cant take the therapist to the social event
what is the conclusion for appropriateness and the practicality
appropriateness for the individual must be considered
also can consider in vitro exposure if vivo doesn't work with phobia
what is the positive effectiveness for the this therapy?
McGrath had 75% people respond effectively to his therapy - this type of therapy takes only weeks compared to the psychodynamic approach
what was the bad effectiveness?
the ability to deal with the phobic object or situation may not generalise beyond the therapeutic setting
the phobic response will be relearnt and could then cause spontaneous recovery of the phobia
what are the ethics of this treatment method?
deliberately exposing an individual to a setting/situation that will make them anxious
but on the other hand - the individual has not been forced to do this treatment an therefore they don't have to do anything they don't want to do
there are no side effects
what is the conclusion for the ethics?
a cost-benefit analysis is needed to be done for each client
if the cost of not having the treatment is high then the outcome will outweigh the treatment and amount of stress it will induce