Save
...
DOCUMENTARY
Amy (Kapadia, 2015)
Digital technology (S8)
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Isla
Visit profile
Cards (26)
Examples of
analogue
technology:
photography
,
film stock
,
film cameras
Examples of digital technology:
DVR
,
portable
digital cameras,
early
mobile phones
How did digital technology revolutionise filmmaking in terms of production and distribution?
Cheaper
,
accessible
to
make
and
watch
,
experimental
What issue does digital technology raise for documentary making?
Truthfulness
/
verisimilitude
of
documentary films
Why does it raise the issue of truthfulness?
Digital film is easily
manipulated
, cannot guarantee
legitimacy
or
objectivity
Why does Kapdia favour the aesthetics of raw footage?
Kapadia
believes
the
aesthetics
of raw footage are more
emotionally resonant
than controlled
composition
Quote from Kapadia on using raw footage:
"
The most interesting stuff was the roughest. That stuff was the most revealing.”
Kapadia
effectively repurposes
footage
which was originally
intended
for other uses (
personal
documentation etc.)
How long was the edit process of Amy?
2 years
Production
schedule involved
intensive research
,
compiling audio
interviews and
footage
Without digital technology,
Amy
couldn't have been made in its’
final
form
Different sources of digital footage in Amy:
-Family home videos
-Personal documentation
-Selfie sequences
-Unofficial studio footage
-Concert footage/fan footage
-National media footage
What's the effect of digital filming in terms of privacy in Amy?
Makes the
private
accessible but
exposes
to the
public
The movement from
analogue
to
digital
modes of technology were significant to
Amy Winehouse’s
rise to fame, why was this?
Notions of
privacy
were changing rapidly; her life became more accessible to the public
–paparazzi
What does digital filming affect in terms of filmmaking in Amy?
-Viewpoint
-Traditional
documentary conventions
-Visual
aesthetics
-Representation of
‘the real’
in Amy
Digital cameras used in
Amy
:
-Portable
DV cameras
-8mm
footage in St
Lucia
-Early
smartphone technology
The
accessibility
of
cheap
smart phones/digital cameras means many people could provide Kapadia with
footage
of Amy
This meant there's a range of perspectives, what effect does this have on objectivity?
Kapadia
is less influential on creating a
preferred
reading –his only control is in
editing room
Many of the footage is sourced from family and friends, what effect does this have on the sense of intimacy?
Allows audience to see behind Amy as
a
construct
,
understand her more deeply as a
friend
Quote on the effect of digital technology on Amy's rise to fame:
“As we enter
2008
onwards, digital technology is used to
metaphorically
and
physically
attack Amy.”
What digital sound recording equipment was used in Amy?
Interviews
recorded with
small
,
digital
recorders and then matched with
images
/
footage
in the
film
–never see interviewees in the
flesh
How could this use of digital sound technology have an effect on the film?
Not having
a
camera on interviewees may be unobtrusive in the interview process, encouraging
more honest responses
How could it be argued this use of digital sound technology doesn't have an effect on the film?
Whether this is digital, or analogue doesn’t make a
difference
–Kapadia's skill is in choosing
visuals
to support the
stories
What's the effect of the use of non-diegetic and diegetic music layered over images in Amy?
Effective in creating
emotion
and
deepening
meaning/
understanding
(Back to
Black
sequence)
Two examples of non-linear digital editing in Amy?
-Juxtaposition
of images and footage to provide meaning/impact
-Post-production
techniques manipulate our response
Does the fact these are done digitally change their effect?
Not really
, but it is
easier
to
achieve
these
techniques
on
digital