Non Treatment Decision sometimes known as passive euthanasia
Decision medical professionals make to withhold or withdraw medical treatment or life support that is keeping a person alive because they are not going to get better, or because the person asks them to.
Active Euthanasia
Deliberate action performed by a third party to kill a person for example lethal injection. Illegal in the UK
Sanctity of Life
idea that life is intrinsically sacred or has such worth that it is not considered within the power of a human being
Quality of Life
way of weighing the extrinsic experience of life, that affects or justifies whether or not it is worth continuing life
Personhood
quality of human life that makes it worthy - usually linked to certain higher capacities
Autonomy and the right to die:
idea that human freedom should extend to decide the time and manner of death
Voluntary euthanasia
this applies when a person’s life is ended painlessly by their own choice
Non-voluntary euthanasia
applies when a person is unable to express their wish to die but there are reasonable grounds for ending their life painlessly —> chose by another person
Dignity
the worth of quality of life which can be linked to sanctity of freedom
Palliative care
end of life care to make the person's remaining moments of life as comfortable as possible
Involuntary Euthanasia
where a person is killed against their wishes, for example when the Nazis were killing disable people
Legality:
illegal in Britain and many other nations
a doctor or anyone who deliberately end or assists in the ending of someones life can be charged with manslaughter or murder
Where is euthanasia legal?
Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Canada, Colombia, New Zealand, Spain, Australia and some states in the United States such as Ohio
Why do some people want Euthanasia legalised in the UK?
some believe that the quality of life of the suffering person also matters highly
they believe that if a persons if a person's quality of life is very low then they should be allowed to end their life
ending a life in this situation is justified
Two-thirds of Britons support legalising assisted dying
“Over himself, over his body and mind the individual is sovereign”
John Stuart Mill ‘On Liberty’ 1859
“Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honour God with your bodies.”
St Paul in 1 Corinthians 6:19-20
Sanctity of life:
supreme intrinsic specialness of human life
Genesis said that we were made in the image of God --> imago dei
human sacrifices were stopped as Christianity saw it as sinful and immoral -> stopped by Jesus' sacrifice
we have dignity
God created human life, only God has the right to end it
So God created mankind in his own image. In the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.”
Genesis 1:27 --> sanctity of life
There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under the
heavens, a time to be born and a time to die
Ecclesiastes 3 1-2 => shows the sanctity of life
The story of Job shows the sanctity of life, this is through the suffering of Job and his family endure is accepted for the happiness he experiences
“Thou shalt not kill (murder)”
6/10 commandments -> Sanctity of life
However, the Bible also shows passages that go against the Sanctity of life
Sodom and Gomorrah: against the Sanctity of Life (Genesis 19:1-29)
men threatened to rape 2 visitors (angels) -> Lot tried to protect them
the angels told Lot and his family to flee --> he did
Lord sent burning sulfur onto the town
“No, my friends. Don’t do this wicked thing. Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them."
"Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the Lord out of the heavens"
"like smoke from a furnace"
The Flood: (Genesis 6:5-22 7:1-24 8:1-22)
Noah's ark
killed all the people --> accept Noah
Seven days from now I will send rain on the earth for forty days and forty nights, and I will wipe from the face of the earth every living creature I have made
Everything on dry land that had the breath of life in its nostrils died.
The death of the first born Egyptians: (Exodus 11 12:1-36)
plague sent to kill the first borns --> killed the Pharaoh's son
"Now the Lord had said to Moses, “I will bring one more plague on Pharaoh and on Egypt. After that, he will let you go from here, and when he does, he will drive you out completely."
"Every firstborn son in Egypt will die, from the firstborn son of Pharaoh, who sits on the throne, to the firstborn son of the female slave" --> said by Moses
"he will see the blood on the top and sides of the doorframe and will pass over that doorway"
Weaknesses in the Sanctity of Life:
although sanctity of life is important in judging the value of life, there are other principles that should also be included, such as Jesus’ emphasis on compassion. The problem with the strong sanctity of life view is that it allows unnecessary suffering and is uncompassionate. Perhaps meaning that Quality of Life is more important
However, although the Bible does have the theme of compassion, that doesn’t mean it can be used to overrule the sanctity of life.
Discussion about the Sanctity of Life are centred around a number of associated ideas about Euthanasia:
the ultimate taboo
status of life is undermined
life is undermined socially
perhaps theres another way
The Quality of Life:
idea that human life has to possess certain attributes to have value. e.g. mental/physical capability
the experience of living life
Deterioration of life means that euthanasia might be the best option
Humans being should be able to life dignified lives and end life with dignity --> most compassionate thing to do
Peter Singer believes the quality of life to be an important factor in euthanasia -> non-voluntary euthanasia for babies whose potential quality of life is low, such as due to being born with an incurable condition like spine abifida
Hippocratic Oath: based on the ideas of the Greek physician who believes that is it is wrong for Doctors to allow euthanasia
Peter Singer believed that it should link to personhood
Quality of life and Personhood:
the extent to which a life has some quality about it is often linked to the extent to which there is personhood
higher functions and higher capacity --> awareness of self, others, the world and the will and ability to act are the most fundamental features of human life
spectrum of consciousness --> how an individual connects with others
Quality of Life and Personhood:
Peter Singer -> Not all humans are persons. Singer argued that belief in the sanctity of life of members of our species (humans) was based on ‘Christian domination of European thought’, especially belief in an afterlife and that God had ownership of us.
Singer argues that if we think about what we find wrong with killing someone, it is that it deprives them of the life they want to continue live. voluntarily asked for by a competent adult, then it would not be wrong because they don’t want to continue living their life.
Quality of Life and the slippery slope argument vs personhood:
Archbishop Anthony Fisher makes the slippery slope argument against the quality-of-life view, arguing that wherever euthanasia is legalised, it is extended to more and more people. He points out that in Holland euthanasia was legalised for the terminally ill but 10 year later was legalised for babies in cases of severe illness
Fisher further argues that if Euthanasia is allowed for quality of life, then some elderly or otherwise vulnerable people might be tempted to die because they feel like a burden
Quality of Life and the slippery slope argument vs personhood:
Singer responds that people who receive euthanasia in Oregon are disproportionately white, educated and not particularly elderly, so euthanasia does not especially target vulnerable people
Quality of Life and the Autonomy and the Right to die:
individuals should have autonomy to choose
expect to have control over our bodies and this should allow us to chose our own manner of death and time
permissible for a person to help to die --> not wrong to help the dying die
indirect threats to others
reasonable limitations
The deontological (absolutist) view of autonomy
Quality of Life and the Autonomy and the Right to die: cont'd
Nozick is a libertarian, meaning he thinks people have an absolute right to do whatever they want, so long as they are not harming others, no matter the situation -> but people will choose euthanasia for short-sighted reasons such as when in the temporary grip of negative emotion
coherently adopt a consequentialist view of autonomy, which is to pair it with rationality
John Stuart Mill argued that in matters that do not concern others, individuals should have full autonomy.
Voluntary Euthanasia:
the Hippocratic Oath --> is it against this type of Euthanasia
Killing a patient seems opposed to what a doctor should do
Jonathan Glover (Causing Deaths and Saving Lives, 1977) -> several factors to should be considered before deciding what to do
often requested in very difficult circumstances and is often the focus of campaigns for legal change
physical deterioration will at some point make it impossible to easily chose suicide
morally permissible \
Jonathan Glover several factors before deciding:
helper should be convinced the decision is serious
helper should think that the decision is reasonable
circumstances in which the request comes need considering
Jonathan Glover several side effects:
allowing voluntary euthanasia could lead to involuntary euthanasia