Believes society is based on mutual agreement and unity
Meritocratic society
Gives people status or rewards because of what they achieve, rather than because of their wealth and social position
Ways crime is functional
Reinforces moral codes and social solidarity
Acts as a warning device
Creates jobs
Positive sanctions
Rewards for behaviour
Negative sanctions
Punishments for behaviour
When people commit crime they are punished, which reminds everyone about rights & wrongs' and how people should behave for the greater good of society
When crime/deviance occurs it sends a message that society's social order is breaking down, prompting governments/councils to do something about the problem
Crime creates employment for individuals like lawyers, judges, police officers, which is useful for them and society as a whole
Durkheim's view on crime
Crimes serve a function in society, they are more like violations of moral codes
Durkheim said that a certain amount of crime is normal in society, as it allows society to keep up with social and moral changes</b>
Durkheim said there needs to be a balance of crime in order for society to function properly - too little would not help society understand what socially acceptable behaviour and boundaries are, but too much would lead to chaos and disorder
Durkheim claims that some crimes, like terrorist attacks/mass killings, help to unite society
Terrorist attacks
Paris 2015, Brussels 2016, Anders Breivik 2011
Crime
Functional, healthy, universal, inevitable, and relative
Crime/deviance
Strengthens social solidarity
Crime/deviance
Can also isolate people (e.g. recluses/the elderly who may fear leaving their homes because of fear of crime)
Durkheim does not actually look at what the causes of crime might be
Durkheim suggests that crime/deviance strengthen social solidarity but overlooks how it can also isolate people