Children's moral judgement about lying and truth telling rely on verbal statements factuality + whether like id punished- until 11 use protagonist intention as factor of moral judgements- Piaget
Wimmer- Pre-school and young school age children capable of distinguishing lying from behaviour + can make moral judgements similar to older children and adults
Frued's psycho analytic theory + Skinner Behaviourist theory + Kholberg's cognitive theory
Sweester- folkloristic model of lying- concept of lying not cognitive construct defined by factuality, intention or belief- also a socio-cultural construct
understanding of lying influenced by cultural norms + value- little evidence to support this
Kholberg- cross cultural research- moral development not lying
Binet + Hall- children's understanding of moral development is a topic of investigation in developmental psychology
Interest in children's understanding of lying and truth telling- information limited
previous studies done with western children- societies emphasise individualism- study designed to bridge gap
AIM- testing cultural impact on moral evaluations
Study compares Chinese + Canadian in situations which pro + antisocial actions are denied or acknowledged- original study details why canadian and Chinese selected
Lab with independent measures design- some repeated measures due to each hearing 4 scenarios- 2 of each + asked to apply same rating scale
IV- ppt heard social or physical story
-whether child heard prosocial story- child who carried out a good deed- valued by adults in both countries
- antisocial story- Child who intentionally carried out a bad deed- viewed negatively in both cultures
DV- rating given to characters deed- very very good-> very very naughty
Chinese- 120- from elementary schools in a medium city from People's republic of China
40 - 7 yo - 20m/f
40 - 9 yo - 20m/f
40 - 11 yo - 20m/f
Canadian- 108- from provincial capital but smaller population
36- 7 yo - 20m / 16f
40- 9 yo - 24m/ 16f
32- 11 yo - 14m/ 18f
Most canadian from m/c families- Chinese unknown
Chinese- half of children social story condition- half physical story- assigned randomly
Canadian- 19- 7 yo, 20- 9 yo, 17- 11 yo social story- rest assigned to physical story
ppts read 4 scenarios accompanied by illustrations- two prosocial, two antisocial
Prosocial story- Alex tidies classroom for teacher (good or naughty?) When teacher returned Alex denied doing it (good or naughty?)
Each ppt was tested individually
ppts were instructed of meaning of words and symbols: very very good (3 red stars) neither (blue circle) or very very naughty (3 black crosses)
ppts read either 4 social or physical stories- stories 'deed' rating read first then rating would be indicated verbally or non- or both on the rating chart- then read second section and gave rating again
Meaning of each symbol repeated whenever a question was asked
Words 'good' and 'naughty' in two questions was altered
To control for order effects- two orders of four stories determined using a randomisation table - half had predetermined order, others had the other way round
ppts involved in post- experiment discussions
First analysis of effects of order + gender showed no significant differences so data combined for subsequent analyses
Prosocial/ truth- covariate not significant- children of both cultures rated behaviour similarly
-Canadian children pf all ages gave similar ratings however Chinese became less positive as age increased
prosocial/lie- covariant significant- children rated things differently in both age + conditions- age + culture significant
-Canadian rated lie telling negatively- less negative with age- Chinese changed from negative to positive
Antisocial/truth- Covariate not significant- children from both cultures rated behaviour similarly- positively
Antiscocial/lie- covariate significant- children both rated differently- age + culture significant
-both rated lie negatively in situation
-overall negative ratings increased with age
Concluded- in lying+ truth telling - close relationship between socio-cultural practices + moral judgements exists
Concluded: Chinese rate truth in prosocial + lie telling in same situations more negatively than Canadian children
Concluded: Both show similar moral evaluations of lie telling related to antisocial behaviours
Concluded: emphasis on self-effacement modesty in Chinese culture increasingly has an impact on Chinese Children's moral judgement
Concluded: moral development is contextualised+ affected by environment individual is socialised in