A type of social influence where there is a change in a person's behaviour or opinion as a result of a real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people
Types of conformity (Kelman)
Internalisation
Identification
Compliance
Internalisation
Making the beliefs, values, attitude and behaviour of the group your own (the strongest type of conformity, and often occurs as a result of informational social influence)
Compliance
Following other people's ideas/going along with the group to gain their approval or avoid disapproval (lowest/weakest level of conformity)
Informational social influence
When someone conforms because they want to be right, so they look to others by copying or obeying them, to have the right answer in a situation
Normative social influence
When someone conforms because they want to be liked and be part of a group
NSI and ISI may not be completely exclusive, as suggested by Deutsch and Gerrard's 'Two Process Model'
It may be more beneficial to look at NSI and ISI as complementary, as opposed to mutually exclusive mechanisms
Asch's study
123 male American undergraduates in groups of 6; consisting of 1 true participant and 5 confederates
Participants and confederates were presented with 4 lines; 3 comparison lines and 1 standard line
The real participant always answered last or second to last
Confederates would give the same incorrect answer for 12 out of 18 trials
Asch observed how often the participant would give the same incorrect answer as the confederates versus the correct answer
36.8% conformed, 25% never conformed, 75% conformed at least once
Factors affecting level of conformity
Size of majority/Group size
Unanimity of majority
Task difficulty
Size of majority/Group size
An individual is more likely to conform when in a larger group
Unanimity of majority
An individual is more likely to conform when the group is unanimous i.e. all give the same answer, as opposed to them all giving different answers
Task difficulty
An individual is more likely to conform when the task is difficult
When the task is difficult, we are more uncertain of our answer so we look to others for confirmation. The more difficult the task the greater the conformity
Zimbardo's study
24 American male undergraduate students
Aim: To investigate how readily people would conform to the social roles in a simulated environment, and specifically, to investigate why 'good people do bad things'
Procedure: The basement of the Stanford University psychology building was converted into a simulated prison. Participants were randomly assigned to be either guards or prisoners and their behaviour was observed
Agentic state
When a person believes that someone else will take responsibility for their own actions
Agentic shift
When a person shifts from an autonomous state (the state in which a person believes they will take responsibility for their own actions) to the agentic state
Legitimacy of authority
How credible the figure of authority is. People are more likely to obey them if they are seen as credible in terms of being morally good/right, and legitimate
In Milgram's study, the people saw the experimenter as legitimate as they knew he was a scientist and therefore is likely to be knowledgeable and responsible - this is called expert authority
Agentic state
When people believe they are acting on behalf of an authority figure, rather than taking personal responsibility for their actions
Legitimacy of authority
How credible the figure of authority is, in terms of being morally good/right, and legally based or law abiding
Students are more likely to listen to their parents or teachers than other unknown adults
Expert authority
When the authority figure is seen as legitimate because they are a knowledgeable and responsible expert, like a scientist
Location
Participants obeyed more when the study was conducted at a prestigious university, as it demands obedience and increases trust in the researchers
Uniform
Participants obeyed more when the experimenter wore a lab coat, as it gives them higher status and greater sense of legitimacy
Authoritarian personality1950
Belief that people should completely obey or submit to their authority figures, and suppress their own beliefs
F scale
A scale used to measure the authoritarian personality, requiring participants to rate their agreement with certain statements
Fixed cognitive style
The tendency of those with an authoritarian personality to adopt absolutist/'black and white' thinking and not challenge stereotypes
Reaction formation
When those with an authoritarian personality displace their anger with their harsh, disciplinarian parents onto seemingly 'inferior' others
Adorno's psychodynamic theory
A person's personality traits and attitudes as an adult stemmed from childhood influences such as that of one's parents
Scapegoating
Child with overly harsh and disciplinarian parents displaces their anger with their parents onto seemingly 'inferior' others
On a surface level, the child would idolise their parents, but on an unconscious level, they would fear and despise them, and so arises the need to displace such anger
The child would be more likely to target their displaced anger on those who seem weak and unable to defend themselves, such as minority groups
Reaction formation
The process where the child displaces their anger onto seemingly 'inferior' others
There are serious methodological issues associated with the F-scale, as suggested by Greenstein
Acquiescence bias
The phenomenon of respondents always responding in the same way using the scales provided, regardless of the content shown in the scales
The findings produced by the F-scale may be lacking in validity and reliability due to acquiescence bias
The Authoritarian Personality may not be able to explain all cases of obedience across the whole political spectrum, according to Christie and Jahoda
There are more similarities between the two ends of these spectrums than differences, most notably a large emphasis on utmost respect for legitimate authority