Animal Studies

Cards (19)

  • Animal studies of attachment

    • Lorenz's studies on imprinting in geese, showing a critical period for forming strong bonds
    Harlow's studies on rhesus monkeys, demonstrating their need for physical comfort over just food
  • The generalization of animal behavior to human psychology is problematic due to differences in biology and social/cultural experiences
  • Learning theory provides an intuitive explanation for attachment, but Harlow's research on rhesus monkeys rejects a simple stimulus-response view
  • There are issues with the research, as they assume the results can be generalised to humans
  • Humans differ to animals in many ways, one of which is that behaviour is affected by conscious decisions
  • Animal attachment behaviours have been mirrored in humans

    Animal studies can be useful in understanding human behaviour
  • Animal studies
    • They give us insight into human attachment
    • They are important
  • Harlow's monkeys

    • Comfort is preferred over food, as they always chose the cloth mother, unless they were hungry
  • Harlow's monkey study

    • It has provided us with valuable information about attachments
    • It shows the importance of early attachments on later relationships
    • It has helped social workers understand the severity of neglect and abuse
  • The monkeys were separated from their mothers at a young age, so they were socially abnormal, resulting in a lack of generalisability
  • The evidence is limited by the disputing over the characteristics of imprinting
  • Originally it was thought that an object was 'stamped' on the nervous system, but not it is thought it is less certain than this
  • Guiton found imprinting in chickens

    • Imprinting could be reversed, and after spending time with their own species they could engage in normal behaviour
  • It is thought imprinting is no different than any other type of learning
  • The application of animal studies to real life is unknown
  • Harlow's research may have been affected by confounding variables
  • The two objects differed in many ways, one of which was the heads
  • It is possible the monkeys preferred one over the other due to the more attractive head on the cloth mother
  • Thus the conclusions lack internal validity