Private Nuisance

Cards (16)

  • Private Nuisance
    Behaviour that interferes with the neighbours' ability to use their land and is considered unreasonable
  • Legal definition of nuisance
    An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over it, or in connection with it
  • Nuisance can be indirect (e.g. smells, noise, smoke) or direct (e.g. tree roots encroaching)
  • Who can claim nuisance
    • Anyone who has use or enjoyment of the land, and is affected by the interference, may claim
    • The claimant must have an interest in the land, such as being an owner or tenant
  • What cannot be protected by nuisance
    • A right to a view
    • A right to light
    • TV reception
  • The courts may protect against offensive behaviour that affects the character of the area or property prices
  • Factors of reasonableness
    • Duration
    • Social benefit
    • Malice
    • Sensitivity
    • Locality
  • Adopting a nuisance
    When the occupier fails to deal with a problem, even if it was caused by a previous owner or trespasser
  • A defendant can be liable for a nuisance caused by natural causes they are aware of but fail to deal with
  • Prescriptive right
    If the action has been carried on for at least 20 years with no claimant, the defendant has a right to continue
  • The "moving to the nuisance" defence does not amount to a valid defence
  • Statutory authority
    When the defendant's activities are regulated by law, this can be a defence to a nuisance claim
  • Volenti
    A defence if the claimant has taken active steps to encourage the creation of the nuisance
  • Remedies for nuisance
    • Injunction
    • Abatement
    • Damages
  • Factors for awarding damages instead of an injunction
    • The injury to the claimant's rights is small
    • The claimant can be compensated by a small amount of money
    • It would be unfair on the defendant to grant an injunction
  • The Supreme Court has said an injunction could be the default order in a nuisance claim, and it is open to the defendant to argue damages would be a suitable alternative