Ensure those with good results become in demand, and will be more attracted to them
Encourage cream-skimming (good schools can be selective MC pupils) and silt-shifting (good schools avoid taking less able WC pupils, who damage their league table position)
Benn (2012) - This is a New Labour Paradox, choosing marketisation even though it causes inequality, and then making more policies to tackle inequality
Marketisation benefits the MC by increasing parental choice they can use their economic and cultural capital to choose good schools
Privileged skilled choosers MC parents. Use cultural capital to choose the best schools, network with school admissions, etc. Use economic capital to move into catchment areas, afford travel to the best schools, etc
Disconnected local choosers: wC parents with restricted choices as they have no economic/cultural capital. Less knowledgeable about choices, admissions & playing the system. Closest schools (no matter the quality) were the best option due to travel cost restrictions
Semi-skilled choosers: WC parents with ambitions for their children (unlike local choosers), Lack economic/cultural capital and understanding the market and were frustrated that they couldn't send ther child the best school due to this
A type of academy that is set up by parents, teachers, charities, or community groups and has more autonomy over its curriculum, staffing, and budget than other state schools
Academies
State-funded schools in England that are independent of local authority control and have more freedom over their curriculum, staffing, and budget than other state schools