Key curriculum tool for facilitating learning and teaching
Existing assessment instruments assess intelligence or educational achievement but not a person's capacity to learn
Deakin Crick et al (2004): '"It is arguably our characteristics as learners and what we bring to any particular learning situation that will be the most important quality for us to be able to measure in the unpredictable and ever-changing world of the twenty-first century"'
Learning as a journey
Station 1: The Learning Self (identity, relationships, stories, aspirations)
Station 2: Personal Qualities (values, attitudes, dispositions for learning)
Station 3: Publicly-required and Personally-valued Skills (e.g. managing situations, active citizenship, managing ambiguity)
Station 4: Publicly-assessed and Valued Knowledge
Learning power
The combination of the 4 stations
Core dimensions of learning power
Changing and learning
Critical curiosity
Meaning-making
Dependence and fragility
Creativity
Relationships/interdependence
Strategic awareness
Changing and learning
Negative: Learning ability is fixed, stuck and static. Challenging situations expose limitations and 'failure'
Positive: Learning as a lifelong process, can be learnt. Challenging situations as opportunity to develop and grow
Critical curiosity
Negative: Passive learners, more likely to accept 'received wisdom' uncritically, 'surface' strategies, unlikely to actively engage in speculation
Positive: A desire to find out – 'getting at the truth', willing to question 'received wisdom', 'deep' strategies, willing to reveal their questions and uncertainties in public
Meaning-making
Negative: Respond to new learning on individual merits in piecemeal fashion, interested in criteria for successful performance, happy to live with fragmented knowledge
Positive: Look for connections between new learning and prior knowledge, interested in the 'big picture', making sense of their experience, enjoy pursuing coherence
Dependence and fragility
Negative: Easily disheartened, prefer less challenging situations, easily disheartened when make mistakes or get stuck, self-esteem (in learning) likely to depend on other people and external factors
Positive: Resilient, like a challenge – willing to 'give it a go', willing to make occasional mistakes but learn from them, accept learning is sometimes hard but 'hang in' - stickabililty
Creativity
Negative: Rule bound, like to know exactly what's expected of them, may function well in familiar activities, less imaginative
Positive: Understand learning needs playfulness as well as being purposeful, happy to follow a train of thought without knowing where it will end up, enjoy playing with ideas, receptive to hunches and inklings
Relationships/interdependence
Negative: May either be over-dependent on others or fail to engage properly with others
Positive: Achieve a healthy balance between independent and social learning, like to learn with and from others, when appropriate, recognise the value of watching and emulating
Strategic awareness
Negative: Robotic, may confuse self-awareness with self-consciousness
Positive: Reflective, good at self-evaluation, good at judging the time and resources a task will require, happy to try alternative approaches, can cope with frustration and disappointment
Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory (ELLI)
Assessment tool to measure learning power
ELLI is a 72-item questionnaire, learners report on themselves at a particular point in time using a 5-pt Likert scale from Almost Never to Nearly Always
Dynamic assessment with interactionist orientation
Focused on facilitating improved learner performance
ELLI follows Vygotskian philosophy: "we must not measure the child, we must interpret the child"
Example questions from ELLI
I expect to go on learning for a long time
Getting to the bottom of things is more important to me than getting a good mark
I like to learn about things that really matter to me
If I wait quietly, good ideas sometimes just come to me
When I have trouble learning something, I tend to get upset
I often change the way I do things as a result of what I have learned
I like working on problems with other people
The ELLI profile shows the self-reported level in each dimension of learning power
The research in this paper is qualitative, looking at classroom practices, teachers' perceptions, and examples of pupil work
Teachers varied their response to ELLI profiles, but all found the ELLI profile of individual students was in keeping with their own perception and knowledge of students
Teacher commitment to learner-centred values was a critical factor, and the teachers themselves were the most important vehicles for development in their students of the seven dimensions of learning power
The centrality of the learner-teacher relationship was important, as well as other relationships in class, at home, and in the community
Teachers used metaphors to describe the learning dimensions, particularly for young children
Modelling and imitation, by the teacher and by stronger students, were important, as was linking the learning powers to learning purposes, including public exams
There was a need to actively prioritise time for reflection - for individuals, with learning buddies, and as a whole group
ELLI was used to develop students' self-awareness about their learning, to develop student-owned strategies and targets for change (i.e. Assessment for learning)
Degree of choice regarding how and what students learned, and ownership, were important
Sequencing and framing of material, to stimulate curiosity, creativity, meaning-making, including explicit links to experiences outside school, were used to encourage students to see and make connections
Teachers developed a toolkit of strategies
ELLI was seen as a tool for diagnosis and development of strategies, and for the development of self-awareness, ownership and responsibility for learning - intentional learners
The quality, authenticity and face validity of the ELLI profiles were seen to reflect back to learners and teachers what the learners already say about themselves, and stimulate purposeful learning
There is a call for curricula to place greater emphasis on learning to learn
In the Biological Sciences at Leicester, there can be an excessive focus on fact-regurgitation, and a "learning power" assessment might be a more effective tool for PDP than the current practice
Students struggle to engage "unless it counts", i.e. unless there are marks, and there is a need to demonstrate the crucial need for active development of one's own learning skills