virtue ethics focuses on the actions/character of a good person
virtue ethics is agent-centred
arete
excellence
virtue ethics could be considered empty and circular
disposition
tendency to behave in a particular way
virtue is a disposition possessed by good people
virtue ethicists take a more holistic approach to making moral judgements
holistic
characterized by the belief that the parts of something are intimately interconnected and explicable only by reference to the whole
define the difference between a virtue and a vice
virtue - tendency to behave in a positive way, actions associated with good people
vice - tendency to behave in a negative way, actions associated with bad people
act centred ethics focus on the actions of the person. In those cases morality is based on outcome(utility), or intention(deontology)
agent-centred ethics involves the judgement of character or the person involved. Less emphasis is placed on the action itself as good people tend to do good things
something is good in so far as it performs its function effectively
ergon
function
the concept of good is connected with the idea of function
eudamonia
happiness, to flourish
the utimate good in life is to reach eudamonia
pleasure is an instrumental good, but not the final end. Eudamonia is the final end to which all other ends contribute
Aristotle defines eudamonia as a state of flourishing
to flourish is to achieve ones potential, for example perform ones function
the function of a human being is to "live well"
Eudamonia is not a fleeting state of mind whereas happiness is
For one to be eudaimon, they must subscribe to that line of thinking and let the mantra guide their actions.
eudaimonia is not subjective, but an objective judgement of one's whole life
eudaimonia is intrinsically linked to the happiness of others
Aristotle suggests that ones own flourishing is linked to that of the community
living eudamoniacally is a permanent way of living
"one swallow does not make a summer" - Aristotle
although different pleasures and eudaimonia are connected, pleasure is necessary for eudaimonia to be achieved.
You cannot live a life of "flourishing" without pleasure, so pleasure and eudaimonia are linked
In order for one to desire eudaimonia, it must be pleasurable otherwise it wouldn't be desirable
"the temperate man does not seek an excess of pleasure"
Overindulgence is harmful and doesn't lead to general flourishing
a good thing(or a virtuous person) functions well
Plato and Aristotle believed that the ultimate goal in life was to achieve eudaimonia.
Aristotle defines eudaimonia in a way such that it is linked with living a morally good life
one cannot be happy via exploiting the community
one aims to flourish and lead a good life, achieve eudaimonia
individual flourishing is linked with the flourishing o the commuuntiy. Being a good human involves helping others to flourish
eudaimonia as the highest end
- it is the highest good
- end to all other goods
- other goods are ways of living well(to achieve eudaimonia)
- other aims, we aim for, for their own sake which contribute to the overall flourishing