Asking certain questions e.g. are their racial differences in IQ? May be damaging to members of a particular group
Double obligation dilemma
The more important the issue is, the greater the potential benefit to society, the more likely the individual is to experience distress and discomfort
Mannucci's study
Asked 192 people about ethics and found that deception was thought to be a minor issue and that it was the quality of research that was important
Aronson's cost vs benefit analysis
Allows psychologists to justify their reasons
Protecting the individual
Psychologists responsibility to protect participants from physical and mental harm, however the social group that they belong to may be harmed as a consequence of the research findings, potentially limiting what can be studied
Protecting the individual
Psychologists prevented from using deception as it can be distressing and affect the wellbeing of the participants. However, to investigate issues such as obedience in a valid way then deception is necessary
Institutional context
How is the research going to be used?, what are the reasons for the study?, where is the funding for the research coming from?
Interpretation and application of findings
Need to consider how others may use their findings as there may be misuse e.g. by governments seeking to control people
By gaining better understanding of issues such as gender, race and sexuality we are able to gain a greater acceptance and reduce prejudice
Eyewitness testimony is flawed and shouldn't be the only evidence to convict someone
Scarr argues that we need studies to inform us of what we need to do to help underrepresented people to succeed in this society
Flawed research has been used to dictate social policy and put certain groups at a disadvantage
Research has been used to discriminate against groups in society such as sterilisation of people in the USA because they were of low intelligence or criminals
Research may present issues which offend people by identifying group specific problems, make worrying predictions or evoke strong feeling
Cultural differences in social research, ethnocentric results in old research e.g Milgram carried out studies to see if germans were different (potentially dangerous research question)
Socially sensitive issues around obedience and prejudice e.g. social identity theory implies that society is negative and formation of an ingroup and outgroup alone can cause prejudice
Studying sensitive topics such as the holocaust may impact the people who suffered from this event
Realistic conflict theory says that competition can cause prejudice
Milgram and Sherif's studies were socially sensitive
Stressful for participants being studied
Groups may become labelled negatively
Shows that human nature isn't good e.g. socialidentity theory
May lead to people questioning authority figures
Removal of stereotypes e.g. germans are different hypothesis
Understanding of blind obedience and origins or prejudice
Ways to reduce prejudice e.g. superordinate goals (sherif)
Explanations for past events e.g. the holocaust and rwandan genocide so we can prevent this from happening again
Memory loss related to dementias is socially sensitive for the individual and the carers e.g. the impairments are emphasised
Confidentiality in case studies, may not be able to give fully informed consent, longitudinal studies (are they being abused by researchers as 'human guinea pigs', are their lives now only 'worthy of study')
If memory is found to be unreliable then families of convicted offenders may be affected and victims may become concerned that their recollections may not be taken seriously
Baddeley's research may discredit previous teaching practices regarding learning and remembering information
Positive applications for dementia patients and carers - therapies have been formed on the back of knowledge of memory
HM case study informed us about the role of the hippocampus - informed treatments of dementia and brain surgery
May prevent wrongful convictions - links to the devlin report and innocence project
Baddeley says that revision should be done by making semantic links e.g. using mind maps
Raine had to be careful how he reported the results of his research
Aggression is anti social behaviour so researching it is socially sensitive
Raine found murderers pleading NGRI had brain abnormalities which leads to labelling, may cause them to have their sentence reduced, could be used as a scapegoat, effects the families of victims
Heston found a genetic heritability of Sz - labelling of those with Sz family remembers
Bredgen found children labelling peers as physically/socially aggressive - children may then be stereotyped which could lead to SFP, blame may be placed onto parents for aggression levels