What are the two situational explanations for obedience?
agentic state
legitimacy of authority
What is agentic state?
mental state where we feel no personal responsibility for our behaviour as we are acting for an authority figure, we are freed from consequence
what is autonomous state?
person who behaves according to their own principles and feels responsible for their actions
what is agentic shift?
the shift from autonomous state to agentic state
what are binding factors?
aspects of situation that allow the person to ignore/minimise the damaging effects of their behaviour and reducing the moral strain
What is legitimacy of authority?
we are more likely to obey people who we perceive to have authority over us, justified by the individuals position of power
why is the power that authorities wield legitimate?
it is agreed by society, most accept that authority figures have power over others
strength of agentic state
research support, most of Milgrams participants asked who was responsible for any harm, the experimenter said “I am responsible“ and participants carried on without objecting
limitation of agentic state
agentic shift doesn’t explain many research findings. Rank and Jacobson found that most nurses disobeyed a doctors order to give an excessive drug dose, the nurses remained autonomous and didn’t shift into an agentic state
strength of legitimacy of authority
can explain cultural differences - research shows different countries differ in obedience to authority. for example 16% of Australian women obeyed in a study whereas 85% of German participants obeyed
limitation of legitimacy of authority
can’t explain all (dis)obedience. people may disobey even in a hierarchal structure. Rank and Jacobsons nurses were disobedient to the Dr