Beck (1967) took a cognitive approach to explaining why some people are more vulnerable to depression than others. In particular it is a person's cognitions that create this vulnerability (i.e the way they think)
Beck suggested three parts to this cognitive vulnerability
Negative triad:
Beck proposed that there are three kinds of negative thinking that contribute to becoming depressed:
Negative views of the world, the future and the self
Such negative views lead a person to interpret their experiences in a negative way and so make them more vulnerable to depression
Faulty information processing - When depressed people attend to the negative aspects of a situation and ignore positives
Negative self-schema:
A schema is a 'package' of ideas and information developed through experience
They act as a mental framework for the interpretation of sensory information
Negative self-schema:
A self-schema is the package of information people have about themselves
People use schema to interpret the world, so if a person has a negative self-schema they interpret all information about themselves in a negative way
Most of the negative thoughts experienced by depressed individuals depend on cognitive schemas
Cognitive schema - A well organised cognitive structure of stored information and memories that form the basis of core beliefs about self and others
The negative triad: Three kinds of negative thinking that contribute to becoming depressed
Negative view of the world
Negative view of the self
Negative view of the future
Depressed individuals regard themselves as helpless, worthless and inadequate (catastrophic words)
Negative schemas:
Ineptness schemas - Make people with depression expect to fail
Negative schemas:
Self-blame schemas - Make people with depression feel responsible for all misfortunes
Negative schemas:
Negative self-evaluation schemas - Constantly remind people with depression of their worthlessness
Cognitive biases:
The negative schemas fuel and are fueled by cognitive biases, causing individuals to misperceive reality
Cognitive biases:
Arbitrary inferences - Conclusions drawn in the absence of sufficient evidence
Eg: Man concluding he is worthless because it is raining on the day he planned an outdoor party
Cognitive biases:
Selective abstraction - Conclusions drawn from one part of a situation
Eg: Worker feels worthless when a product doesn't work, even though several people have made it
Cognitive biases:
Overgeneralisation - Conclusions drawn on the basis of a single event
Eg: A student concluding they are worthless based on poor performance on one test
Cognitive biases:
Maximisation and minimisation - Exaggerations in evaluation of performance
Eg: A man believing his car is ruined due to one small scratch (maximisation) or a woman believing herself worthless despite many praises (minimisation)