One strength of the research into attachment and later relationships is supporting evidence:
Early attachment constantly predicts later attachment, emotional wellbeing and attachment to own children
Disorganised attachment is strongly associated with later mental disorder
Therefore, secure attachment as a baby conveys advantages for future development while disorganised attachment appears to seriously disadvantage children
Counterpoint to research support
Not all evidence supports the existence of close links between early attachment and later development:
For example the Regensburg longitudinal study (Becker-Stoll et al. 2008) followed 43 individuals from one year of age. At age 16 attachment was assessed using the adult attachment interview
No evidence of continuity
Therefore it is not clear to what extent the quality of early attachment really predicts later development.
There may be other important factors.
Validity issues with retrospective studies
One limitation of most research into the influence of attachment is that early attachment is assessed retrospectively:
Most research on the link between early attachment and later development aren't longitudinal
Researchers usually ask adult participantsquestions about their relationship with parents, and identify attachment type from this
This relies on the honesty and accurate perception of participants
It is hard to know whether what is being assessed is early attachment or adult attachment
Confounding variables
A limitation of studies into the influence of early attachment on laterdevelopment is the existence of confounding variables:
For example, parenting style may influence both attachment quality and later development
Alternatively genetically-influenced personality may be an influence on both factors.
This means that we can never be entirely sure that it is early attachment and notsome other factor that is influencing later development.