Cog Expl: Gender Schema Theory

    Cards (15)

    • Gender Schema Theory
      cognitive framework related to gender are developed from experience and guide us to understand our own gender and gender-appropriate behaviour
    • Martin & Halverson 1981

      same as Kohlberg but gender-relevant info is acquired before stage 3 and affects later behaviour
    • difference between Kohlberg's theory

      Kohlberg = interest in gender role starts at stage 3 (gender constancy)
      Schema Theory = interest in gender role starts before stage 3
    • in-group schema

      rules on own sex - template for behaviour in groups we identify with; builds gender identity
    • out-group schema
      rules on opposite sex - groups we don't identify with therefore irrelevant and less likely retained
    • example of in-group schema
      “I'm a girl and wear skirt so skirt-wearers are girls”
    • example of out-group schema

      “I’m a girl, play football and rugby”
    • Parents
      • treatment
      • clothes
      • toys
    • example of parental treatment
      fathers rougher with sons
    • example of parents - clothes
      sons in blue, daughters in pink
    • example of parents - reinforcement
      sons punished for dancing around like a fairy/'girl'
    • examples of parents - toys
      daughters given dolls
    • supporting evidence
      Martin & Halverson 1983 = kids under 6 y/o are more likely to remember photos of gender-consistent behaviour, they changed the sex of the person carrying out the gender-inconsistent behaviour too - memory can be distorted if it doesn't fit with existing gender schema
    • support - complements Kohlberg's theory

      Stangor & Ruble 1989 = gender schema and constancy describe 2 different processes. Gender schema is how organisation of information is remembered whereas gender constancy is linked to motivation and eagerness of engaging in gender-appropriate behaviour
    • limitation - overemphasis on individual

      exaggerates the importance of cognitive and schematic factor but ignores social influences such as parental influence and the roles of rewards and punishments - punishments decrease likelihood of frequent behaviour and rewards increase likelihood therefore experience forms a gender schema that can guide their understanding of gender-consistent and inconsistent behaviour
    See similar decks