The middle level of conformity where a person changes their public behaviour and their private beliefs, but only while they are in the presence of the group
It is possible the rate of conformity dropped because the real participants became suspicious of the experiment and not because the pressure to conform is necessarily less in larger groups
When the task was made significantly more difficult, by making the difference between the line lengths significantly smaller, the rate of conformity increased (percentage not reported)
This is likely to be the result of informational social influence, as individuals look to another for guidance when undertaking an ambiguous task, in order to be 'right'
Group size: 1 confederate (lower conformity 3%), 2 confederates (lower conformity 12.8%), 3 confederates (remained the same 32%), 15 confederates (lower conformity ≈29%)
Unanimity: one confederate gave the correct answer throughout (lower conformity 5%), one confederate gave a different incorrect answer to the majority (lower conformity 9%)
Task Difficulty: task made significantly more difficult (higher conformity*)
Adopt a nomothetic approach as they attempt to provide general principles relating to human behaviour when observed under group pressure from a majority
Uses scientific methods, often in highly-controlled laboratory settings, to investigate key concepts which can be replicated
Asch's original study only used male participants, showing a beta bias as it may have ignored or minimised the differences between men and women in relation to conformity
Asch's study procedure involved participants being placed in a group with confederates who gave incorrect answers, and the participant having to publicly state whether they agreed with the majority or not
Conducting psychological research in a laboratory setting allows for high levels of control and replication, but may ignore or minimise real-world differences like gender