Cards (5)

  • * large sample was used?
    • in meta-analysis was 2000 babies & their primary att figures
    • reduces impact of anomalous results caused by bad methodology/very unusual participants
    • more likely to be representative sample
    • more data to analyse & apply
    • findings of different att types can be generalised to wider population
  • * ethically sound?
    • was no new data collection involved in study
    • no more children had to be put through potentially traumatic s.s procedure
    • credible
    • is more ethical way of studying cultural variations as no primary data being collected so no manipulation
    • ethical guideline of protection from harm not being broken
    • is secondary data meaning it was collected previously by other researchers & no children were distressed as a result
  • X issue of imposed etic?
    • test for one culture used in unfamiliar cultures
    • s.s designed by american based on british theory
    • ? population
    • means comparisons between countries may have little meaning
    • difficult to generalise findings from western research to other non western cultures
  • X differences within one culture?
    • wrong to think everyone in culture have same practices
    • within culture there are many subcultures with different child rearing techniques
    • may be ethnically/racially based or class specific
    • e.g middle classes may have different techniques to working class
    • upper class traditionally use nannies
    • ? internal
    • does not consider different subcultures/sectors of society that may impact child rearing & att they have
    • means these individual differences may be confounding variables & impact accuracy of results
  • X looked at small number of studies?
    • despite large numbers of studies combined in the meta-analysis over half 18/32 were in USA
    • only 5/32 were carried out in collectivist cultures - only 1 in china
    • ? population
    • unrepresentative of att in all cultures
    • findings cannot be generalised to everyone
    • suggests cause & effect relationship cannot be established between att styles & cultural differences in child rearing