To avoid bias, the sample must be randomly selected so each organism has an equal chance of being counted; if a sample is not random, it is unrepresentative and may give an overestimate of biodiversity, if deliberately selected
Advantage: Data not biased by selective sampling; disadvantage: It may not cover all areas equally and species with low presence may be missed
Area of habitat is mapped out using long tape measures (often area is 10m^2) and using pairs of random co-ordinates (generated by a calculator), the quadrats are positioned within the square for sampling
A quadrat is a wireframe of a fixed size e.g. 1m^2, 0.5m^2 or 0.25m^2 that defines the sample area size
Number of samples depends on habitatsize, timeavailable, and number of species in habitat, if two habitats are being compared, the same number should be taken for each
The larger the sample, the more representative the data; it is possible to calculate mean data to assess how many are valid, once it is stable, you have had enough (10 is often sufficient)
Recording results: Need a suitable results table, prepared in advance, that allows room to record all species identified
For species richness, presence of a species is recorded; qualitative data, it is unlikely all species are listed, for species evenness, the number of each species is recorded (more meaningful for biodiversity); quantitative