these arise when a conflict exists between the rights of the participants in research studies and the goals of research to produce authentic , valid and worthwhile data
what is informed consent?
pps must be told the aims and procedure of the investigation and about any possible risks they could be subject to + the right to withdraw at any point of the investigation , then they should make an informed decision about whether tp participate in the research study or not without feeling obliged or coerced
why dont researchers wish to disclose info about the study to pps?
could lead to demand characteristics being presented = bias
what are the various ways of dealing with informed consent?
priorgeneral consent - consenting to being deceived in study
presumptive consent - researcher gathers opinions from a similar group to pps to whether the study is acceptable or not w/o informing the actual group of pps = allows demand characteristics to be eliminated
retrospective - pps asked for consent after study is conducted
what is deception?
the act of deliberately withholding or misleading information from pps at any stage of the research study
when is deception only seen as acceptable ?
when the pps could guess the true nature of the aims of the investigation or when the deception will not cause distress
what is the solution to deception ?
debriefing :
all pps should be debriefed either verbally or written
pps should be made aware of the aims and anything info they didn't know prior to the investigation such as control + experimental groups
pps should have the right to choose to withhold or withdraw their data
what is another solution for deception apart from debriefing should the pps be allowed to ?
counselling
Protection from harm:
pps should be protected from any psychological and physical harm they wouldn't encounter in their everyday life
all through the investigation pps should be reminded that they have the right to withdraw
what is a cost - benefit analysis ?
analysis carried out before the study by the ethics committee whereby the pros and cons are weighed up to determine whether the study will be ethical
Privacy + confidentiality :
right of privacy - pps have the right to control info about themselves such as how much is used / released
confidentiality - refers to the rights pps have which concern any personal data of theirs being protected (enshrined under the law of Data Protection Act)
what is a solution to maintaining privacy and confidentiality of pps?
anonymity can be maintained
achieved by researchers not recording any personal details of their pps so none of the results of data can be traced back to them
researchers can refer to pps as numbers or letters e.g HM case study
pps should be reminding during both debrief and briefing that their data will be protected