publicly conforming to the behaviour of others but privately maintaining ones own views
Internalisation
takes on the majority views, the behaviours becomes apart of your belief systems and remain even when the individual is gone
Identification
takes on the majority views but doesn't necessarily agree with them
Normative conformity
the desire to be like
Informational conformity
the desire to be right
Asch 1956 

asked volunteers to take part in visual discrimination task
Asch's finding
conformity rates were 33%
Evaluation of Asch
Small sample size, beta bias, cultural bias
Variables of Asch
Group size, unanimity and task difficulty
Zimbardo 1973
Conformity into social roles. He set up a fake prison in the basement of Stanford prison
dehunamanised
treated like animals eg deloused given a number
deindividuated
identity was removed eg dark glasses
Evaluation of Zimbardo
Beta bias, cultural differences, small sample size, demand characteristics
Milgram
looked into obedience. electric shocks
Evaluation of Milgram
right to withdraw was cloudy, lacks historical validity, deception, small sample size, beta bias
Abu Ghraib prison
Us arm detention centre, detainees were abused - "just following orders"
situational variables which affect obedience
Locations, proximity and uniform
dispositional explanation 

highlights the importance of the individuals personality
Adorno et al
dispositional factors influence obedience levels, created and piloted the f-scale
Authorities personality
high levels of obedience
Rutter 1996
locus of control = internal, I control my own destiny + external, others control my own destiny
Evaluation of LOC
Deterministic, decrease in religious beliefs causing internal as they are self-driven
Moscovici
green blue slides ( minority influence)
Minority influence
consistency, flexibility, commitment and snowball effect
Snowball effect
More people listen to the views and get convinced by the majority
Agentic state
a person sees themselves as an agent for carrying out another persons wishes
autonomous state
takes responsibility for their own actions
agentic shift
moving from the autonomous state to the agentic state
Evaluation of agentic shift
Real life application (abu Ghraib prison) reducationalist,
dispositional factors 

the individual or personal characteristics of a person that may affect how they behave/conform
authoritian personalities 

reinforces the role of authority + social division
Adnoro et al 

example of a dispositional factor - is the authoritarian personality as they are naturally more obedient found out through the F-scale
example of situational factors is the environment + social context
f-scale 

2000 white middle class Americans
Strengths of dispositional 

Milgram+ Elms found a positive correlation between authorities personality + obedience in a small sample of obedient individuals
weaknesses of dispositional 

low population validity eg only white
include that correlation is not causation - other factors are more likely to influence obedience levels
situational influences

external factors that impact our behaviours + obedience
types of situational 

proxmity - closer you are more likely you are to follow
status of authority - people of authority cause obedience levels to rise
personal responsibility - if a person of authority tells you to do something you and someone asks you why you acted a certain way you will reply with the person of authority told you to do it