If studies + ideas from psychology cannot be used in everyday life
Then they are not useful
Usefulness of research
Extent to which findings can be used or not used in everyday life
Strength of conducting useful research
Main advantage is that it can be used to improve human behavior in some way
E.g. if we find a better way to treat mental illness then it is useful to society as a whole
Problems with conducting useful research
Studies might be unethical to gain more valid results
Studies need to be high in ecological validity to be of more use to society but this can be quite difficult if they are conducted in a laboratory
Individual explanations
Account for behaviours using factors from within person (called dispositional factors, such as personality)
Situational explanations
Account for behaviours using factors from external environment (situations that people find themselves in)
Strengths of individual and situational explanations debate
Findings can be very useful to society as a whole
If we find out which behaviours are down to individuals + which are down to situations we find ourselves in, we can help explain human behavior more clearly
If psychologists find that there is an interaction between both sides of debate then this is useful too
Problems with individual and situational explanations debate
It is not always easy to separate out individual + situational factors
Studies might be unethical to gain more valid results
Studies need high ecological validity to be of more use to this debate but this can be difficult if they take place in a laboratory
Nature
Behaviours that are thought to be hardwired into people pre-birth (innate / genetic)
Nurture
Behaviours that are thought to develop through lifetime of person
Strengths of the nature vs nurture debate
Findings can be very useful to society as a whole
If we find out which behaviours come from nature + which from nurture we can help to explain behavior more clearly
If there is an interaction between both sides of debate this is useful too
Problems with the nature vs nurture debate
It is not always easy to separate out what is nature + what is nurture
If behavior is seen to be purely down to nature (genetics) this can be very socially sensitive
Sections of society could use this to undertake a 'eugenic' movement to get rid of people with 'inferior genes' = unacceptable
Studies might be unethical in order to gain more valid results
Use of children in psychological research
Children aged under 16 cannot give their own informed consent to take part in a study
Children under age 16 must get parental or loco parentis permission to participate
Use of appropriate language to ensure children understand
Children may get bored quicker + tired faster than adults so this needs to be considered
Use of animals in psychological research
Psychologists must work within law about protecting animals
Number of animals should be kept to a minimum
Social species should be kept together + non-social species kept apart
Housing in cages should not lead to overcrowding + increased stress levels
Strengths of using animals in research
We can conduct research on animals that we cannot do on humans for ethical reasons
Weaknesses of using animals in research
Due to differences in physiological + psychological 'make-ups' of animals + humans it can be difficult to generalize from animal studies to human behavior
It can be expensive to house animals + they need proper care compared to humans who can participate in + leave a study at will
How does Dement & Kleitman's study contribute to the application of psychology to everyday life?