realistic conflict theory explains prejudice through conflicts of interest between groups
intergroup competition
competitions between individuals from different groups - often over resources
negative interdependence
when both groups are seeking the same goal - can only be 1 winner and 1 loser so leads to out-group hostility and increase solidarity between the in-group
limited resources
specific physical and finite resources result in fiercest prejudice - struggle may be for scarce resources such as: food, territory but also symbolic resources such as: power and prestige
positive interdependence
when groups have to be reliant on each other to achieve a goal, prejudice can decrease - each group reliant on each other to be successful
superordinate goals
goals which can only be achieved through inter group cooperation - lead to increasingly favorable perceptions between groups and decrease prejudice
strength
sherif robbers cave supports RCT that competition leads to prejudice
at the end of stage 2 boys were asked which boys they considered friends - most of their answers were people of their own group and called groups "stinkers" and "sneaky"
showing that negative interdependence competition increases prejudice
weakness
research suggests that competition is not necessary for prejudice to occur
tajfel proves this as when bristol boys were placed into groups, they displayed prejudice by giving their own team higher points which were not limited and no prize given for a winner
therefore shows there does not need to be competition for prejudice