Locke, Mill, Wollstonecraft, Friedan - emphasise limited government and negative liberty
Modern liberals
Rawls, Keynes - promote an 'enabling state' to maximise personal liberty (positive liberty)
Liberals agree
The core function of the state is to protect 'natural rights'
The concept of 'natural rights' originated from Locke and modern liberals, such as Rawls, were also huge advocates for 'natural rights'
Liberals agree that individuals have fundamental rights such as Freedom of Speech that should be respected by the State
Liberals argue that we must tolerate views that we may find offensive, but individuals have a duty to ensure that their actions do not limit the rights of others
Liberals do not support speech that advocates violence as it holds the potential to limit the freedom of others
Harm principle
Proposed by Mill - limits freedom of speech that can harm others
Liberals firmly believe that we should be allowed to express ourselves fully as guided by our own free will rather than by outside authorities (religion, the authoritarian state) via a rationalist education system
Classical liberals
Advocate a minimal or 'night watchman' state to maximise personal freedom (negative liberty)
Modern liberals
Advocate an enabling state to maximise equality of opportunity (positive liberty)
Classical liberals see Rawls' ideas as 'illiberal', as in their view, redistribution of wealth is a 'surrender to Socialism' and collectivist thinking at the expense of the individual
Classical liberal economics
Promotes a laissez-faire approach - the market will correct itself, the economy should be based on free market principles only
Classical liberals argue that a state-dominated economy is likely to see monopolies, with little motivation to improve quality or reduce prices
Keynesianism
Allows a greater degree of state intervention in the economy to advance equality of opportunity and to maximise freedom for the individual (particularly in relation to employment)