Types of attachment:

Cards (8)

  • What was Ainsworth's strange situation procedure?
    • controlled observation in a laboratory setting with a two way mirror
    • behaviours used to judge attachment included:
    1. proximity-seeking
    2. Exploration and secure-base behaviour
    3. Stranger anxiety
    4. Separation anxiety
    5. Response to reunion
  • Ainsworth's procedure continued: (every 3 mins)
    1. Baby encouraged to explore room - Test exploration and secure base
    2. Stranger comes in, talks to the caregiver and approaches the baby - tests stranger anxiety
    3. Caregiver leaves stranger and baby together - tests separation anxiety and stranger anxiety
    4. The caregiver returns and the stranger leaves - tests reunion and exploration/secure base
    5. The caregiver leaves the baby - tests separation anxiety
    6. The stranger returns - tests stranger anxiety
    7. The caregiver returns and is re-united with the baby - tests reunion behaviour
  • Type B attachment:
    • Secure attachment (type b)
    • Explore happily but regularly go back to caregiver (proximity seeking and secure-base behaviour)
    • Usually show moderate separation distress and moderate stranger anxiety
    • Securely attached babies require and accept comfort from the caregiver in the reunion stage
    • 60-75% of British babies are classified as secure
  • Type A attachment:
    • Insecure avoidant attachment (type a)
    • Explore freely but do not seek proximity or show secure-base behaviour
    • Show little or no reaction when their caregiver leaves and little stranger anxiety
    • Make little effort to make contact when the caregiver returns and may even avoid contact
    • 20-25% of british babies are classified as insecure-avoidant
  • Type c attachment:
    • Insecure resistant (type c)
    • Seek greater proximity than others so explore less
    • Show high levels of stranger and separation anxiety
    • They resist comfort when reunited with their caregiver
    • 3% of British babies are classified as insecure-resistant
  • Predictive validity - strength
    P - One strength of the Strange situation is that its outcome predicts a number of aspects of the baby's later development
    E - A large body of research has shown that babies and toddlers assessed as Type B (secure) tend to have better outcomes than others, both in later childhood and in adulthood.
    E - Ward et al found securely attached babies also tend to go on to have better mental health in adulthood. Those babies assessed as having insecure-resistant attachment and those not falling into types A, B or C tend to have the worst outcomes
    L - This suggests that the Strange Situation measures something real and meaningful in a baby's development.
  • Strength - good reliability
    P - A further strength of the Strange situation is good inter-rater reliability
    E - Bick et al tested inter-rater reliability for the stranger situation for a team of trained observers and found agreement on attachment type in 94% of cases
    E - This may be because the procedure takes place under controlled conditions and because behaviours (such as proximity-seeking and stranger anxiety) involve large movements and are therefore easy to observe
    L - This means that we can be confident that attachment type as assessed by the strange situation does not depend on subjective judgements.
  • Limitation - culture bound
    P - One limitation of the strange situation is that it may not be a valid measure of attachment in different cultural contexts
    E - The strange situation was developed in Britain and the US. It may be culture- bound, i.e. only valid for use in certain cultures
    E - Babies have different experiences in different cultures and these experiences may affect their response to the strange situation.
    L- This means that it is very difficult to know what the strange situation is measuring when used outside of Europe and the US